Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T09:34:22.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Licensed Segments and Safe Paths

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Junko Itô  and
R. Armin Mester
Junko Itô
Affiliation:
University of California/Santa Cruz
R. Armin Mester
Affiliation:
University of California/Santa Cruz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The following pages sketch a system of constraints intended to sharpen and organize a number of current assumptions surrounding the concept of “prosodic licensing”, as proposed in Itô (1988) and further developed in later work (Bagemihl 1991; Charette 1990; Goldsmith 1990; Inkelas 1991; Itô and Mester 1991; Kaye 1990; Lombardi 1991; Piggott 1991; Zec 1988; and others). The proposal to be developed below draws on Optimality Theory (Prince and Smolensky 1993); one of the goals is to explicate the notion of the coda as a “secondary licenser” (Goldsmith 1990) and to clarify the privileged status of geminate and partial geminate clusters (Prince 1984) with respect to syllabification. After laying out some background assumptions (Section 1), we present the definitions and constraints that form the core of our theory of licensing (Section 2). We illustrate the approach with an analysis of the syllable structure of Japanese (Section 3) and conclude the paper with a discussion of remaining issues and problems relating to the general typology of syllabification systems (Section 4).

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 38 , special_issue 2: Special Issue: Constraint-Based Theories in Multilinear Phonology , June 1993 , pp. 197 - 213
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archangeli, Diana, and Pulleyblank, Douglas 1993. Grounded Phonology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. [In press.]Google Scholar
Bagemihl, Bruce 1991. Syllable Structure in Bella Coola. Linguistic Inquiry. 22:589–646.Google Scholar
Borowsky, Toni 1990. Topics in the Lexical Phonology of English. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Browman, Catherine P., and Goldstein, Louis 1989. Articulatory Gestures as Phonological Units. Phonology. 6:201–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charette, Monik 1990. Licence to Govern. Phonology. 7:233–253.Google Scholar
Clements, G.N. 1985. The Geometry of Phonological Features. The Phonology Yearbook. 2:225–252.Google Scholar
Clements, G.N. 1990. The Role of the Sonority Cycle in Core Syllabification. Pp. 283–333 in Papers in Laboratory Phonology I. Kingston, John and Beckman, Mary, eds. Cambridge, etc.: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, G.N. 1993. Place of Articulation in Consonants and Vowels: A Unified Theory. In L’Architecture et la géométrie des représentations phonologiques. Laks, Bernard and Rialland, Annie, eds. Paris: Éditions du C.N.R.S. [In press.]Google Scholar
de Saussure, Ferdinand 1916. Cours de linguistique générale. Lausanne: Payot.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John 1990. Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce 1989. Compensatory Lengthening in Moraic Phonology. Linguistic Inquiry. 20:253–307.Google Scholar
Hume, Elizabeth V. 1992. Front Vowels, Coronal Consonants, and Their Interaction in Non-Linear Phonology. PhD thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 1985. A Theory of Phonological Weight. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon 1991. Prosodic Constituency in the Lexicon. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko 1988. Syllable Theory in Prosodic Phonology. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko 1989. A Prosodic Theory of Epenthesis. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 7:217–259.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko, and Mester, R. Armin 1991. Stricture Features and Licensing. Paper read at the NSF Workshop on Properties of Feature Organization, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko, Mester, R. Armin, and Padgett, Jaye 1993. Constraint Ranking and Underspecification. Paper read at the Trilateral Phonology Workshop, University of California/Berkeley.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto 1904. Lehrbuch der Phonetik. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan 1990. ‘Coda’ Licensing. Phonology. 7:301–330.Google Scholar
Lombardi, Linda 1991. Laryngeal Features and Laryngeal Neutralization. PhD thesis. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 1988. Feature Geometry and Dependency: A Review. Phonetica. 43:84–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John J., and Prince, Alan S. 1986. Prosodic Morphology. Ms.Google Scholar
Myers, Scott 1987. Vowel Shortening in English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 5:485–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ní Chiosáin, Máire, and Padgett, Jaye 1993. Consonant-Vowel Interactions and ‘Cross-Tier’ Effects. Paper read at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Padgett, Jaye 1991. Stricture in Feature Geometry. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carole 1988. On Constraints and Repair Strategies. The Linguistic Review. 6:71–97.Google Scholar
Piggott, G.L. 1991. Apocope and the Licensing of Empty-Headed Syllables. The Linguistic Review. 8:287–318.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan S. 1983. Relating to the Grid. Linguistic Inquiry. 14:19–100.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan S. 1984. Phonology with Tiers. Pp. 234–244 in Language Sound Structure. Aronoff, Mark and Oehrle, Richard T., eds. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan S., and Smolensky, Paul 1993. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Ms.Google Scholar
Sagey, Elizabeth 1990. The Representation of Features and Relations in Non-Linear Phonology. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth 1984. On the Major Class Features and Syllable theory. Pp. 107–136 in Language Sound Structure. Aronoff, Mark and Oehrle, Richard T., ed. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth 1990. A Two-Root Theory of Length. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers. 14:123–171.Google Scholar
Sievers, Eduard 1881. Grundzüge der Phonetik. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca 1990. Moras and Other Slots. Pp. 254–280 in Proceedings of the First Meeting of the Formal Linguistics Society of Midamerica. Meyer, Denise, Tomioka, Satoshi, and Zidani-Eroğlu, Leyla, eds. University of Wisconsin-Madison: Linguistics Student Organization.Google Scholar
Vance, Timothy 1987. An Introduction to Japanese Phonology. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Zec, Draga 1988. Sonority Constraints on Prosodic Structure. PhD thesis, Stanford University.Google Scholar