Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:33:02.525Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lexicography: statics and dynamics*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Patrick Drysdale
Patrick Drysdale*
Affiliation:
W. J. Gage Limited
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There is a widely accepted fiction that anything printed in a dictionary has, by virtue of its presence there, a kind of divine authority. Thus lexicographers are sometimes called as expert witnesses in courts of law, and dictionaries themselves can be used in evidence. Professor Daniel Cook has based an interesting article on a case in Maryland in 1913, in which a man was charged on the complaint of a young woman that he had accosted her with the greeting, “Hello, chicken.” The defendant stated that chicken was “a perfectly proper term. Just look in Webster’s dictionary and you will find that I have transgressed no laws.” The magistrate found an antiquated copy of Webster in his desk and read, “Chicken—The young of various birds, a child, a young woman.”

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , Spring 1969 , pp. 108 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper was originally given as one of invitational Summer Session lectures at the University of Victoria, August 1969.

References

1 American Speech, 34. 20-25 (February, 1959), reprinted in Allen, Harold B., Applied English Linguistics, 2nd ed. (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1964), 450–56.Google Scholar

2 The relevant definition numbers have been added in parentheses.

3 Klein, Ernest, A Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the English Language (New York: Elsevier; A-K 1966, L-Z 1967), p. 1637.Google Scholar

4 I am indebted to Dr. Samuel C. Monson, of Scott, Foresman and Company, Glenview, Illinois, for supplying the two following citations as well as that from Parade on the next page.

5 The idea that meanings for different parts of speech should be given under main sense groupings rather than in separate blocks (or even separate entries) arose out of discussions and correspondence with Dr. Samuel C. Monson some years ago.

6 Bolinger, Dwight, Aspects of Language (New York: Harcourt, 1968), p. 288.Google Scholar