Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T14:51:31.461Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lexicography in-your-face: The active semantics of Pastaza Quichua ideophones

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2017

Janis B. Nuckolls ,
Tod D. Swanson ,
Diana Shelton ,
Alexander Rice  and
Sarah Hatton
Janis B. Nuckolls*
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University
Tod D. Swanson*
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Diana Shelton*
Affiliation:
Independent researcher
Alexander Rice*
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University
Sarah Hatton*
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University
*
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We argue that a multimodal approach to defining a depictive class of words called ‘ideophones’ by linguists is essential for grasping their meanings. Our argument for this approach is based on the formal properties of Pastaza Quichua ideophones, which set them apart from the non-ideophonic lexicon, and on the cultural assumptions brought by speakers to their use. We analyze deficiencies in past attempts to define this language's ideophones, which have used only audio data. We offer, instead, an audiovisual corpus which we call an ‘antidictionary’, because it defines words not with other words, but with clips featuring actual contexts of use. The major discovery revealed by studying these clips is that ideophones’ meanings can be clarified by means of a distinction found in modality and American Sign Language studies. This distinction between speaker-internal and speaker-external perspective is evident in the intonational and gestural details of ideophones’ use.

Résumé

Nous soutenons que pour définir une classe de mots descriptifs appelés « idéophones », il est essentiel d'adopter une approche multimodale, si l'on veut saisir toutes les nuances de leur signification. Notre argument en faveur de cette approche se base d'une part sur les propriétés formelles des idéophones Pastaza Quichua, propriétés qui les distinguent du lexique non idéophonique, et d'autre part sur les hypothèses culturelles que les locuteurs contribuent à leur utilisation. Nous analysons les lacunes des efforts antérieurs cherchant à définir les idéophones de cette langue, qui n'ont fait appel qu’à des données audio. Nous proposons plutôt un corpus audiovisuel, que nous appelons « anti-dictionnaire » parce qu'il définit des mots non pas à l'aide d'autres mots, mais avec des vidéoclips qui mettent en scène d'authentiques contextes d'utilisation. La principale révélation de ces clips est que les significations des idéophones peuvent être clarifiées à l'aide d'une distinction que l'on trouve dans les études sur la modalité, et sur l'ASL (la langue des signes américaine); cette distinction entre les perspectives interne et externe au locuteur se manifeste dans des détails d'intonation et de gestuelle qui caractérisent l'usage des idéophones.

Keywords

ideophonesgesturelexicographyQuechuapragmaticsidéophonesgesteslexicographieQuechuapragmatique
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 62 , Issue 2: Structuring sensory imagery: Ideophones across languages and cultures/La structuration de l'imagerie sensorielle : les idéophones dans diverses langues et cultures , June 2017 , pp. 154 - 172
Copyright
© Canadian Linguistic Association/Association canadienne de linguistique 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akita, Kimi. this issue. Linguistic integration of Japanese mimetics and its typological implications.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan, and Plungian, Vladimir A.. 1998. Modality's semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2(1): 79–124.Google Scholar
Childs, G. Tucker. 1996. Where have all the ideophones gone? The death of a word category in Zulu. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 15: 81–103.Google Scholar
Childs, G. Tucker. 2014. Constraints on violating constraints: How languages reconcile the twin dicta of “Be different” and “Be recognizably language”. In Pragmatics and Society 5(3): Ideophones: Between grammar and poetry, ed. Lahti, Katherine, Barrett, Rusty, and Webster, Anthony K., 341–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Déchaine, Rose-Marie, and Mudzingwa, Calisto. 2014. Phono-semantics meets phono-syntax: a formal typology of ideophones. Paper presented at “Structuring Sensory imagery: Ideophones across languages and cultures.” Department of Linguistics, University of Rochester.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark. 2013. Ideophones and gestures in everyday speech. Gesture 13(2): 143–165.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark. 2014. Making new ideophones in Siwu: Creative depiction in conversation, In Pragmatics and Society 5(3): Ideophones: Between grammar and poetry, ed. Lahti, Katherine, Barrett, Rusty, and Webster, Anthony K., 384–405.Google Scholar
Drown, Frank, and Drown, Marie. 1961. Mission to the Headhunters. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nick. 2009. The anatomy of meaning: Speech, gesture, and composite utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haviland, John B. 2000. Pointing, gesture spaces and mental maps. In Language and gesture: Window into thought and action, ed. McNeill, David, 13–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam. 1977. Studies in the behavior of social interaction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Kita, Sotaro. 1997. Two-dimensional semantic analysis of Japanese mimetics. Linguistics 35(2): 379–415.Google Scholar
Klassen, Doreen Helen. 1999. You can't have silence with your palms up: Ideophones, gesture, and iconicity in Zimbabwean Shona women's Ngano (Storysong) performance. Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn, and Maddieson, Ian. 1988. Phonetic universals in consonant systems. In Language, speech and mind: Studies in honor of Victoria A. Fromkin, ed. Hyman, Larry M., Fromkin, Victoria, and Li, Charles N., 63–78. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McNeill, David. 1985. So you think gestures are nonverbal? Psychological Review 92(3): 350–71.Google Scholar
McNeill, David. 1992. Hand and mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mihas, Elena. 2013. Composite ideophone-gesture utterances in the Asheninka Perene ‘community of practice’, an Amazonian Arawak society from central-eastern Peru. Gesture 13(1): 28–62.Google Scholar
Nuckolls, Janis B. 1996. Sounds like life: Sound-symbolic grammar, performance and cognition in Pastaza Quechua. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuckolls, Janis B. 2012. Ideophones in bodily experience in Pastaza Quichua. In Proceedings of STLILLA, 2011. The Society for the Teaching of Indigenous Languages of Latin America.Google Scholar
Nuckolls, Janis B. 2014. Ideophones' challenges for typological linguistics: The case of Pastaza Quichua. In Pragmatics and Society 5(3): Ideophones: Between grammar and poetry, ed. Barrett, Rusty, Webster, Anthony, and Lahti, Katherine, 355–383.Google Scholar
Nuckolls, Janis B., and Swanson, Tod D.. 2014. Earthy concreteness and anti-hypotheticalism among Amazonian Quichua people. In Tipiti, Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America 12(1): Amazonian Quichua, ed. Uzendoski, Michael and Whitten, Norman E., 48–59. <http://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/tipiti/>Google Scholar
Nuckolls, Janis B., Stanley, Joseph A., Nielsen, Elizabeth, and Hopper, Roseanna. 2016. The systematic stretching and contracting of ideophonic phonology in Pastaza Quichua. International Journal of American Linguistics 82(1): 95–116.Google Scholar
Pierre, Francois. 1983. Viaje de exploracion al Oriente Ecuatoriano 1887–1888 [Exploration trip to the East of Ecuador 1887–1888] . Translated by Vargas, Jose Maria from Voyage d'exploration d'un missionnaire dominicain chez lez tribus sauvages de Équateur, Paris 1889. Quito, Ecuador: Ediciones Abya-Yala.Google Scholar
de Ruiter, Jan-Peter. 2000. The production of gesture and speech. In Language and gesture: Window into thought and action, ed. McNeill, David, 248–311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen, Goodwin, Charles, and LeBaron, Curtis. 2011. Embodied interaction in the material world: An introduction. In Embodied Interaction: Language and body in the material world, ed. Streeck, Jürgen, Goodwin, Charles, and LeBaron, Curtis, 1–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Webster, Anthony K. 2014. Rex Lee Jim's ‘Mouse that sucked’: On iconicity, interwoven-ness and ideophones. In Pragmatics and Society 5(3): Ideophones: Between grammar and poetry, ed. Lahti, Katherine, Barrett, Rusty, and Webster, Anthony K., 431–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westerman, Diedrich H. 1930. A study of the Ewe language. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilcox, Sherman, and Shaffer, Barbara. 2006. Modality in American Sign Language. In The expression of modality, ed. Frawley, W., 207–237. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar