Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T00:21:02.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Jacek Fisiak, ed. Reconstruction and Typology. In the series Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 96. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 1997. Pp. x + 368. 238 DM (hardcover).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Vit Bubenik
Vit Bubenik*
Affiliation:
Memorial University of Newfoundland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews/Comptes rendus
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , June 1998 , pp. 210 - 218
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brugmann, Karl. 1904. Kurze vergleichende Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen. Strassburg: Trübner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dik, Simon C. 1989. The theory of functional grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert. 1985. The fallacy of typology: Remarks on the Proto-Indo-European stop-system. Lingua 65:1–27.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans H. 1986. Principles of historical linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Job, Michael. 1989. Sound change typology and the ‘ejective’ model. In The new sound of Indo-European: Essays in phonological reconstruction, ed. Vennemann, Theo, 123–136. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kilian, Lothar. 1988. Zum Ursprung der Indogermanen. Bonn: Habelt.Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. 1955. Akcentuacja połabska. In Studia z Filologii Polskiej i Słowiańskiej. Vol. 1,349–374. Warsaw.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P. 1974. Proto-Indo-European syntax. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Makkay, János. 1987. The Linear Pottery and the early Indo-Europeans. In Reconstructing languages and cultures, ed. Skomal, Susan Nacev and Polomé, Edgar C., 165–190. Washington: Institute for the Study of Man.Google Scholar
Piggott, Stuart. 1983. The earliest wheeled transport. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Pisowicz, Andrzej. 1988. Objections d’un arménologue contre la théorie gioitale. Folia Orientalia 25:213–225.Google Scholar
Renfrew, Colin. 1987. Archaeology and lannguage: The puzzle of Indo-European origins. London: Cape.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai S. 1929. Polabische Studien Wien-Leipzig: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai S. 1989. Grundzüge der Phonologic 7th ed. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht. [1939.]Google Scholar
Szemerényi, Oswald. 1967. The new look of Indo-European: Reconstruction and typology. Phonetica 17:65–99.Google Scholar
Szemerényi, Oswald. 1970. Einführung in die vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Szemerényi, Oswald. 1985. Recent developments in Indo-European linguistics. Transactions of the Philological Society. London 1985:1–71.Google Scholar
Winter, Werner. 1992. Armenian, Tocharian, and the ‘glottalic’. In Reconstructing languages and cultures, ed. Polome, Edgar C. and Winter, Werner, 111–127. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar