Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:51:40.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Heather Goad  and
Yvan Rose
Heather Goad
Affiliation:
McGill University
Yvan Rose
Affiliation:
Memorial University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 48 , Issue 3-4 , December 2003 , pp. 139 - 148
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archibald, John. 1993. Language learnability and L2 phonology: The acquisition of metrical parameters. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Jill N. 1997. Positional faithfulness, positional neutralisation and Shona vowel harmony. Phonology 14:1–46.Google Scholar
Broselow, Ellen. 1984. An investigation of transfer in second language phonology. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 22:253–269.Google Scholar
Broselow, Ellen, Chen, Su-I, and Wang, Chilin. 1998. The emergence of the unmarked in second language phonology: Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20:261–280.Google Scholar
Brown, Cindy, and Matthews, John. 1997. The role of feature geometry in the development of phonemic contrasts. In Focus on phonological acquisition, ed. Hannahs, S.J. and Young-Scholten, Martha, 67–112. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, and Halle, Morris. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Clements, George N., and Keyser, Samuel J.. 1983. CV phonology: A generative theory of the syllable. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Côté, Marie-Hélène. 2000. Consonant cluster phonotactics: A perceptual approach. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Demuth, Katherine. 1995. Markedness and the development of prosodic structure. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 25, ed. Beckman, Jill N., 13–25. Amherst: Graduate Linguistic Student Association.Google Scholar
Deville, Gérard. 1891. Notes sur le développement du langage II. Revue de linguistique et de philologie comparée 24:10–42, 128–143, 242–257, 300–320.Google Scholar
Dinnsen, Daniel A. 1998. On the organization and specification of manner features. Journal of Linguistics 34:1–25.Google Scholar
Eckman, Fred. 1977. Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language Learning 27:315–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Féry, Caroline. 1995. Alignment, syllable, and metrical structure in German. Seminar fur Sprachwissenschaft. SFS-Report-02–95.Google Scholar
Fikkert, Paula. 1994. On the acquisition of prosodic structure. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
Flege, James E. 1980. Phonetic approximation in second language acquisition. Language Learning 30:117–134.Google Scholar
Gnanadesikan, Amalia. In press. Markedness and faithfulness constraints in child phonology. In Constraints in phonological acquisition, ed. Kager, René, Pater, Joe, and Zonneveld, Wim. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goad, Heather, and Rose, Y van. In press. Input elaboration, head faithfulness and evidence for representation in the acquisition of left-edge clusters in West Germanic. In Constraints in phonological acquisition, ed. Kager, René, Pater, Joe, and Zonneveld, Wim. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John. 1976. Autosegmental phonology. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John. 1990. Autosegmental and metrical phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Grunwell, Pamela. 1975. The phonological analysis of articulation disorders. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 10:31–42.Google Scholar
Hancin-Bhatt, Barbara. 1994. Phonological transfer in second language perception and production. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Harris, John. 1997. Licensing inheritance: An integrated theory of neutralisation. Phonology 14:315–370.Google Scholar
Ingram, David. 1974. Phonological rules in young children. Journal of Child Language 1:49–64.Google Scholar
Ingram, David. 1976. Phonological disability in children. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko. 1986. Syllable theory in prosodic phonology. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1968. Child language, aphasia, and phonological universals. The Hague: Mouton. [1941.]Google Scholar
Kahn, Daniel. 1976. Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Kehoe, Margaret, and Lleó, Conxita. 2003. The acquisition of syllable types in monolingual and bilingual German and Spanish children. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, ed. Beachley, Barbara, Brown, Amanda, and Conlin, Fran, 402–413. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Levelt, Clara. 1994. On the acquisition of place. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
Macken, Marlys. 1992. Where’s phonology? In Phonological development: Models, research, implications, ed. Ferguson, Charles, Menn, Lise, and Stoel-Gammon, Carol, 249–269. Timonium: York Press.Google Scholar
Macken, Marlys, and Ferguson, Charles. 1983. Cognitive aspects of phonological development: Model, evidence, and issues. In Children’s language, Vol. 4, ed. Nelson, Keith E., 256–282. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Oostendorp, Marc van. 2000. Phonological projection: A theory of feature content and prosodic structure. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan, and Smolensky, Paul. 1993. Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms., Rutgers University and University of Colorado, Boulder.Google Scholar
Rice, Keren. 1996. Aspects of variability in child language acquisition. In Proceedings of the UBC International Conference on Phonological Acquisition, ed. Bernhardt, Barbara, Gilbert, John, and Ingram, David, 1–14. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Sagey, Elizabeth. 1986. The representation of features and relations in nonlinear phonology. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1980. The role of prosodic categories in English word stress. Linguistic Inquiry 11:563–605.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil V. 1973. The acquisition of phonology: A case study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew. 1986. Towards a theory of phonological development. Lingua 68:3–38.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 1999. Phonetics in phonology: The case of laryngeal neutralization. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics 2: Papers in Phonology 3, ed. Gordon, Matthew K., 25–146.Google Scholar
Stoel-Gammon, Carol, and Dunn, Carla. 1985. Normal and disordered phonology in children. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Richard A. 1996. Consonant clusters and cue preservation in Tsou. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Zoll, Cheryl. 1998. Positional asymmetries and licensing. Ms., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar