Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:24:21.451Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Martha Mcginnis  and
Leslie Saxon
Martha Mcginnis
Affiliation:
University of Victoria
Leslie Saxon
Affiliation:
University of Victoria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 58 , Issue 2: The syntax of relative clauses La syntaxe des propositions relatives , July 2013 , pp. 151 - 155
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bruening, Benjamin. 2001. Syntax at the edge: Cross-clausal phenomena and the syntax of Passamaquoddy. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin. 2004. Two types of wh-scope marking in Passamaquoddy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22:229–305.Google Scholar
Davis, Henry. 2010. A unified analysis of relative clauses in St’át’imcets. Northwest Journal of Linguistics 4:1–43.Google Scholar
Del Gobbo, Francesca. 2005. Chinese relative clauses: Restrictive, descriptive or appositive? In Contributions to the XXX Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, ed. Brugè, Laura, Giusti, Giuliana, Munaro, Nicola, Schweikert, Walter, and Turano, Giuseppina, 287–305. Venezia: Cafoscarina.Google Scholar
Frantz, Donald. 2009. Blackfoot grammar. 2nd ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 2005. How do verbs get their names? Denominal verbs, manner incorporation, and the ontology of verb roots in English. In The syntax of aspect: deriving thematic and aspectual interpretation, ed. Erteschik-Shir, Nomi and Rapoport, Tova, 42–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. and Comrie, Bernard. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8:63–99.Google Scholar
Koch, Karsten. 2008. Intonation and focus in Nie?kepmcxin (Thompson River Salish). Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Krause, Cornelia. 2001. On reduced relatives with genitive subjects. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Sohn, Ho-Min. 1980. Theme-prominence in Korean. Korean Linguistics: Journal of the International Circle of Korean Linguistics 2:2–19.Google Scholar
Yang, Dong-Whee. 1987. Theory of barriers and relativization. Language Research 23:1–37.Google Scholar