We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Hale, Mark and Reiss, Charles. 2000. Phonology as cognition. In Phonological knowledge: Conceptual and empirical issues, ed. Burton-Roberts, Noel, Carr, Philip, and Docherty, Gerard, 161–184. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M.2008. Enlarging the scope of phonologization. University of California Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report, 382–409.Google Scholar
Keyser, Samuel J. and Stevens, Kenneth N.. 2006. Enhancement and overlap in the speech chain. Language82:33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingston, John. 2007. The phonetics-phonology interface. In Handbook of phonology, ed. Lacy, Paul de, 435–456. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Myers, Scott. 2000. Boundary disputes: The distinction between phonetic and phonological sound patterns. In Phonological knowledge: Conceptual and empirical issues, ed. Burton-Roberts, Noel, Carr, Philip, and Docherty, Gerard, 245–272. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth N., Keyser, Samuel J., and Kawasaki, Haruko. 1986. Toward a phonetic and phonological theory of redundant features. In Invariance and variability in speech processes, ed. Perkell, Joseph S. and Klatt, Dennis H., 426–449. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar