Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:49:07.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Benjamin Shaer
Benjamin Shaer*
Affiliation:
Carleton University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 58 , Issue 1: Temporal and modal dimensions of legal discourses , March 2013 , pp. 1 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Allan, Keith. 2001. Natural language semantics. Maiden, M: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Becker, Angelika and Klein, Wolfgang. 2008. Recht verstehen: Wie Laien, Juristen und Ver-sicherungsagenten die “Riester-Rente” interpretieren. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Blum, Brian A. 2001. Contracts: Examples and explanations. 3rd ed. New York: Aspen.Google Scholar
Brennan, Colleen B. 2001. Linguistics and the law. Available at: www.csa.com/discoveryguides/linglaw/overview.php.Google Scholar
Conley, John M. and O’Barr, William M.. 2005. Just words: Law, language, and power. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Coulthard, Malcolm and Johnson, Alison. 2007. An introduction to forensic linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coulthard, Malcolm and Johnson, Alison. 2010. Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Clark D., Levi, Judith N., Green, Georgia M., and Kaplan, Jeffrey P.. 1994. Plain meaning and hard cases. Yale Law Journal 103:1561–1625.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Susan. 2001. Representing rape: Language and sexual consent. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gibbons, John. 2003. Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language in the justice system. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gozdz-Roszkowski, Stanislaw. 2011. Patterns of linguistic variation in American legal English: A corpus-based study. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Grewendorf, Günther and Rathert, Monika, eds. 2009. Formal linguistics and law. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hart, Herbert L. A. 1994. The concept of law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heffer, Chris. 2005. The language of jury trial: A corpus-aided analysis of legal-lay discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney. 2002. The verb. In The Cambridge grammar of the English language, ed. Huddleston, Rodney and Pullum, Geoffrey K., 71-212. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Inquisitive Semantics. 2013. Mission statement. Available at: sites.google.com/site/inquisitivesemantics/Home.Google Scholar
International Association of Forensic Linguists. 2006. What is the IAFL? Available at: www.iafl.org.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, Paul W. 1999. The cultural study of law: Reconstructing legal scholarship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. 1992. Introduction to the problems of legal theory: A translation of the first edition of the Reine Rechtslehre or Pure theory of law [1934]. Trans. Paulson, Bonnie L. and Paulson, Stanley L.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kniffka, Hannes. 2007. Working in language and law: A German perspective. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Olsson, John. 2004. Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language, crime and the law. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans. 1947. Elements of symbolic logic. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Shaer, Benjamin. 2010. Review of Kahn, Paul W., The cultural study of law: Reconstructing legal scholarship, trans. Miquet, Francoise. Archives de Philosophie du droit 53:523-526.Google Scholar
Shuy, Roger W. 2006. Linguistics in the courtroom: A practical guide. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shuy, Roger W. 2012. Using linguistics in trademark cases. In Oxford handbook of language and law, ed. Tiersma, Peter and Solan, Lawrence, 449-462. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Solan, Lawrence. 1993. The language of judges. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solan, Lawrence. 2010. The language of statutes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Solan, Lawrence and Tiersma, Peter. 2005. Speaking of crime: The language of criminal justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Steedman, Mark. 2005. The productions of time: Temporality and causality in linguistic semantics. Ms., University of Edinburgh. Available at: ftp.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/pub/steedman/temporality/temporality2.pdf.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Ruth. 2008. Sullivan on the construction of statutes. 5th ed. Markham: LexisNexis Canada.Google Scholar
Tiersma, Peter and Solan, Lawrence. 2012. Oxford handbook of language and law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2003. Series editor’s preface. In Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language in the justice system, ed. Gibbons, John, xi-xii. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vogel, Carl. 2007. N-gram distributions in texts as proxy for textual finger prints. In Fundamentals of verbal and nonverbal communication and the biometric issue, ed. Esposito, Anna, Bratanic, Maja, Keller, Eric and Marinaro, Maria, 189-194. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
Weinrib, Ernest J. 1995. The idea of private law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wyner, Adam Z. 2008. Violations and fulfillments in the formal representation of contracts. Doctoral dissertation, King’s College London.Google Scholar

Legal materials cited

Flores-Figueroa v. United States, 556 U.S. 646 (2009).Google Scholar
R. v. Find, [2001] S.C.J. No. 34, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 863.Google Scholar