We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Hans Kronning. Modalité, cognition et polysémie: sémantique du verbe modal devoir. Dans la collection Studia Romanica Upsaliensia 54. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell International. 1996. 200 pages (broché).
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
27 June 2016
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Références
Ducrot, Oswald. 1980. Analyse de textes et linguistique de l’énonciation. Dans Les mots du discours, sous la dir. Ducrot, d’Oswald et Bourcier, Daniele, 7–56. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald. 1984. Le dire et le dit. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Huot, Hélène. 1974. Le verbe devoir: Étude synchronique et diachronique. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 2: Descriptive applications. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sueur, Jean-Pierre. 1975. Étude sémantique et syntaxique des verbes devoir et pouvoir. Thèse de doctorat de troisième cycle, Université de Paris X, Nanterre.Google Scholar
Sueur, Jean-Pierre. 1979. Une analyse sémantique des verbes devoir et pouvoir. Le français moderne47:97–120.Google Scholar