Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:43:08.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fragments, ellipsis, and PF-repair: New evidence from Indonesian

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Yosuke Sato
Yosuke Sato*
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Merchant (2004) proposes that a fragmentary response like the one in (1b) to the question in (1a) is derived from its full-fledged sentential counterpart in (1c).

  1. (1) a. Who did she see?

  2. b. [DP John]

  3. c. [TPShe saw John] (Merchant 2004:673)

Type
Squibs/Notules
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 58 , Issue 3 , November 2013 , pp. 497 - 505
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boeckx, Cedric and Lasnik, Howard. 2006. Intervention and repair. Linguistic Inquiry 37:150–155.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 1984. Parametric syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. Martin, Roger, Michaels, David and Uriagereka, Juan, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter and Jackendoff, Ray. 2005. Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen. 2010. Invisible last resort: A note on clefts as the underlying source for sluicing. Lingua 120:1714–1726.Google Scholar
Fortin, Catherine. 2007a. Indonesian sluicing and verb phrase ellipsis: Description and explanation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Fortin, Catherine. 2007b. Indonesian sluicing. Paper presented at the 81st Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Anaheim, CA.Google Scholar
Fortin, Catherine. 2007c. Indonesian sluicing and the P-stranding generalization. Paper presented at the 14th Annual Meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistic Association (AFLA 14), Montreal, Quebec.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Pauline. 2009. The short answer: Implications for direct compositionality. Paper presented at Yale University Linguistic Colloquium, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Jayaseelan, K.A. 1990. Incomplete VP deletion and gapping. Linguistic Analysis 20:64–81.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard. 1999. On feature strength: Three minimalist approaches to overt movement. Linguistic Inquiry 30:197–217.Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason. 2004. Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 27:661–738.Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason. 2008. An asymmetry in voice mismatches in VP-ellipsis and pseudogapping. Linguistic Inquiry 39:169–179.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of grammar: Handbook in generative syntax, ed. Haegeman, Liliane, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, Cilene, Nevins, Andrew, and Vicente, Luis. 2009. Cleaving the interactions between sluicing and preposition stranding. In Romance languages and linguistic theory 2006, ed. Wetzels, Leo and Weijer, Jeroen van der, 175–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ross, John. 1969. Guess who? In Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, ed. Binnick, Robert I., Davison, Alice, Green, Georgia M., and Morgan, Jerry L., 252–286. Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Sato, Yosuke. 2010. Minimalist interfaces: Evidence from Indonesian and Javanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sato, Yosuke. 2011. P-stranding under sluicing and repair by ellipsis: Why is Indonesian (not) special? Journal of East Asian Linguistics 20:339–382.Google Scholar
Szczegielniak, Adam. 2006. All sluiced up, but no alleviation in sight. Ms., Harvard University.Google Scholar
Szczegielniak, Adam. 2008. Islands in sluicing in Polish. In Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL), ed. Abner, Natasha and Bishop, Jason, 404–412. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Takahashi, Shoichi. 2004. Pseudogapping and cyclic linearization. In Proceedings of North East Linguistics Society (NELS) 34, ed. Moulton, Keir and Wolff, Matthew, 571–585. Graduate Linguistic Student Association (GLSA), University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Vicente, Luis. 2008. Syntactic isomorphism and non-isomorphism under ellipsis. Ms., University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. 1977. On clitics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. and Pullum, Geoffrey K.. 1983. Cliticization vs. inflection: English n’t. Language 59:502–513.Google Scholar