No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 June 2016
In a recent paper Melville Jacobs outlined briefly the history of linguistic research in connection with indigenous languages of Oregon. In this paper I will not repeat what has already been said, but rather attempt to describe the field situation in Oregon at the present time as accurately and completely as possible.
In May 1963 I began a survey of the indigenous languages still spoken in Oregon and the data presented below were derived from this survey. The purpose of the study was to determine the number of possible informants still using each of the native languages and the level of competence of each speaker in so far as this could be determined without actually doing linguistic field-work at the time. This information was a necessary prerequisite to the organization of a programme of research designed to salvage as much of the remaining languages in the area as possible.
1 Jacobs, Melville, The Fate of Indian Oral Literatures in Oregon, Northwest Review 5, Number 3 (1962), 90–99 Google Scholar.
2 This research was sponsored by the National Science Foundation under NSF research grant GS 72.
3 Voegelin, C. F. and Voegelin, F. M., Map of North American Indian Languages (Menasha, Wisconsin: American Ethnological Society, 1941)Google Scholar.
4 Jacobs, Melville, personal communication, and Morris Swadesh, On the Penutian Vocabulary Survey, IJAL, 20 (1954), 133 Google Scholar.
5 For a more thorough discussion of linguistic groups listed as Athapaskan speaking, cf. Pierce, Joe E. and Ryherd, James M., The Status of Athapaskan Research in Oregon, IJAL 30 (1964), 137–43 Google Scholar.
6 Bruce Rigsby has been working for the past year with the Umatilla and Warm Springs Sahaptin, and Haruo Aoki is reportedly writing a grammar based on his field-work with the Nez Perce.
7 C. F. Voegelin and F. M. Voegelin, Map of North American Indian Languages.
8 Frachtenberg, Leo J., Alsea Texts and Myths, BBAE 58 (1920)Google Scholar.
9 Frachtenberg, Leo J., Coos Texts, Columbia University Contributions to Anthropology 1 (1913), 1–216 Google Scholar.
10 Frachtenberg, Leo J., Kalapuya Texts, University of Washington Publications in Anthropology 11 (1945), 143–369 Google Scholar.
11 Frachtenberg, Leo J., Lower Umpqua Texts and Notes on the Kusan Dialects, Columbia University Contributions to Anthropology 4 (1914), 1–156 Google Scholar.
12 Jacobs, Melville, Coos Myth Texts, University of Washington Publications in Anthropology 8 (1940), 127–260, and Coos Narrative and Ethnological Texts, University of Washington Publications in Anthropology 8 (1939), 1–125 Google Scholar.
13 Jacobs, Melville, Santiam Kalapuya Texts, University of Washington Publications in Anthropology 11 (1945), 3–142 Google Scholar.
14 Frachtenberg, Leo J., Coos Grammatical Sketch, BBAE 40, 2 (1922), 279–430 Google Scholar.
15 Frachtenberg, Leo J., Siuslawan, BBAE 40, 2 (1922), 431–630 Google Scholar.
16 Jacobs, Melville, Northwest Sahaptin Texts, Volume 1, University of Washington Publications in Anthropology 2 (1929), 175–244 Google Scholar.
17 Jacobs, Melville, A Sketch of Northern Sahaptin Grammar, University of Washington Publications in Anthropology 4 (1931), 85–292 Google Scholar.
18 Sapir, Edward, Takelma Texts, University of Pennsylvania Museum of Anthropological Publications 2 (1909), 1–267 Google Scholar.
19 Sapir, Edward, The Takelma Language, BBAE 40, 2 (1922), 1–296 Google Scholar.
20 Barker, M. A. R., Klamath Texts, University of California Publications in Linguistics 30 (1963)Google Scholar.
21 Barker, M. A. R., Klamath Grammar, University of California Publications in Linguistics 32 (1964)Google Scholar.
22 Hoijer, Harry, Some Problems of American Indian Linguistic Research, Papers from the Symposium on American Indian Linguistics, University of California Publications in Linguistics 10 (1954), 3 Google Scholar.
23 Ibid., 4.