We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Eric Reuland, ed. Arguments and Case: Explaining Burzio’s Generalization. In the series Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 2000. Pp. xii + 253. US$72.00 (hardcover).
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
27 June 2016
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Belletti, Adriana. 1988. The Case of unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry19:1–34.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 1993. Ergativity and ergative unergatives. In MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 19: Papers on Case and agreementII, ed. Phillips, Colin, 45–88.Google Scholar
Bok-Bennema, Reineke. 1991. Case and agreement in Inuit. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W.1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johns, Alana. 1992. Deriving ergativity. Linguistic Inquiry23(1): 57–88.Google Scholar
Laka, Itziar. 1993. Unergatives that assign ergative, unaccusatives that assign accusative. In MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 18: Papers on Case and agreementI, ed. Bobaljik, Jonathan D. and Phillips, Colin, 149–192.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 1991. Case and licensing. In ESCOL 8, ed. Westphal, G., B.Ao, , and Chae, H.-R., 234–253. Columbus: Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David. 1978. Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics SocietyIV, 157–189.Google Scholar