Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:22:27.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dominance vs. Precedence in the Double Object Construction: New Facts from Fongbe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Claire Lefebvre
Claire Lefebvre*
Affiliation:
Université du Québec à Montréal
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since the paper by Barss and Lasnik (1986), the fact that the double object construction exhibits Theme/Goal asymmetries has been the object of an important debate in the literature. The central question of this discussion is whether these asymmetries should be accounted for in terms of dominance (e.g., Larson 1988, 1990; Aoun and Li 1989; den Dikken 1991) or precedence (e.g., Barss and Lasnik 1986; Jackendoff 1990; Tremblay 1991). On the dominance account, the Goal must asymmetrically c-command the Theme (e.g., Larson 1988, 1990). On Barss and Lasnik’s account, the Goal and the Theme of the construction may symmetrically c-command each other but the Goal must precede the Theme. This proposal is captured in their definition of domain of (1986:352).

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 38 , Issue 4 , December 1993 , pp. 395 - 424
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abney, Steven 1987 The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. PhD thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Abney, Steven Anonymous 1983 Eléments de recherche sur la langue Fon. Cotonou.Google Scholar
Aoun, Joseph, and Li, Audrey 1989 Scope and Constituency. Linguistic Inquiry 20:141–172.Google Scholar
Brousseau, Anne-Marie, and Lumsden, John S. 1992 Nominal Structure in Fongbe. Journal of West African Languages 22:1–22.Google Scholar
Barss, Andrew, and Lasnik, Howard 1986 A Note on Anaphora and Double Objects. Linguistic Inquiry 17:347–352.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1986 Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1988 Some Notes on the Economy of Derivation and Representation. Ms.Google Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel 1991 Serial Verbs, Object Sharing’, and the Analysis of Dative Shift. Linguistics in the Netherlands 8:31–40.Google Scholar
Greene, Giorgia 1974 Semantics and Syntaxic Regularity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane 1989 Getting the Dative Alternation. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 10:113–122.Google Scholar
Gruber, J.S. 1992 Proper Argument Projection in Igbo and Yoruba. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 17:139–165.Google Scholar
Guéron, Jacqueline, and Hoekstra, Teun 1991 Chaînes temporelles et phrases réduites. Ms.Google Scholar
Hale, Ken, and Keyser, Jay 1987 A View from the Middle. MIT Lexicon Project Working Papers 10.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray 1990 On Larson’s Account of the Double Object Construction. Linguistic Inquiry 21:427–455.Google Scholar
Johnson, Kyle 1991 Object Positions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9:577–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard S 1984 Connectedness and Binary Branching. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S 1992 Word Order. Paper read at GLOW meeting, Lisbon.Google Scholar
Kinyalolo, Kasangati K.W. 1993 Licensing in DP in Fon. Ms.Google Scholar
Koopman, Hilda 1984 The Syntax of Verbs: from Verb Movement Rules in the Kru Languages to Universal Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Koster, lan, and Reuland, Eric, eds. 1991 Long Distance Anaphora. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Larson, Richard 1988 On the Double Object Construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19:335–391.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard 1990 Double Objects Revisited: Reply to Jackendoff. Linguistic Inquiry 21:589–632.Google Scholar
Lebeaux, David 1983 A Distributional Difference between Reciprocals and Reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry 14:723–730.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Claire 1991a Take Serial Verb Constructions in Fon. Pp. 37–78 in Serial Verbs: Grammatical, Comparative and Cognitive Approaches. Lefebvre, Claire, ed. Special issue of Studies in the Sciences of Language Series 8Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Claire 1991b Note sur la position de AGRO dans la structure syntaxique. Revue québécoise de linguistique 20:281–294.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Claire 1992 AGR in the Languages Without Person and Number Agreement: The Case of the Clausal Determiner in Haitian and Fon. Pp. 137–156 in Functional Categories. Lefebvre, Claire, Lumsden, John S. and Travis, Lisa, eds. Special issue of Canadian Journal of Linguistics 37.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Claire 1993 New Facts from Fongbe on the Double Object Construction. Ms.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth, and Rapoport, Tova R. 1988 Lexical Subordination. Chicago Linguistic Society 24.Google Scholar
Oehrle, Richard T. 1976 The Grammatical Status of the English Dative Alternation. PhD thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Pica, Pierre 1987 On the Nature of the Reflexivization Cycle. Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society 19:483–499.Google Scholar
Pica, Pierre 1991 On the Interaction between Antecedent — Government and Binding: The Case of Long Distance Reflexivization. Pp. 119–137 in Long Distance Anaphora. Koster, Jan, and Reuland, Erick, eds. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven 1989 Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT. Press. Google Scholar
Tenny, Carol 1987 Grammaticalizing Aspect and Affectedness. PhD thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa 1984 Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation. PhD thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa 1990 AGRO. Paper read at Phrase Structure/Acquisition Project, Montreal.Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa 1992 Inner Aspect and the structure of VP. Cahiers de linguistique de l’Université du Québec à Montréal 1:132–149.Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa, and Lamontagne, Greg 1992 The Case Filter and Licensing of Empty K. Pp. 157–174 in Functional Categories. Lefebvre, Claire, Lumsden, John S. and Travis, Lisa, eds. Special issue of Canadian Journal of Linguistics 37.Google Scholar
Tremblay, Mireille 1991 An Argument Sharing Approach to Ditransitive Constructions. Pa per read at Ninth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Stanford.Google Scholar
Voorst, Jan van 1988 Event Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossRefGoogle Scholar