Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:48:50.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Disorders Affecting Comprehension of Syntactic Form: Preliminary Results and their Implications for Theories of Syntax and Parsing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

David Caplan  and
Nancy Hildebrandt
David Caplan
Affiliation:
Montreal Neurological Institute
Nancy Hildebrandt
Affiliation:
Montreal Neurological Institute
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Linguistic analyses of aphasic patients’ performances have developed to the point where interesting, non-trivial descriptions and explanations of pathological performances are available in linguistic and processing terms. The purpose of this paper is to present a short synopsis for linguists of several recent analyses of aphasic patients’ disturbances in the sphere of comprehension of syntactic form. This presentation is designed to illustrate some of the logical and methodological issues regarding the analysis of aphasic data, as well as to present specific results of our investigations. On the basis of our case studies, we also suggest several aspects of syntactic structure and parsing.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 33 , Issue 4: Special Issue: Linguistic Theory and External Evidence , December 1988 , pp. 477 - 505
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arbib, Michael, Caplan, David, and Marshall, J.C. 1984 Neural Models of Language Processes. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Badecker, William, and Caramazza, Alfonso 1985 On Considerations of Method and Theory Covering the Use of Clini cal Categories as in Neurolinguistics and Cognitive Neuropsychology: The Case Against Agrammatism. Cognition 20:97–126.Google Scholar
Berwick, Robert C., and Weinberg, Amy 1984 The Grammatical Basis of Linguistic Performance: Language Use and Acquisition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan 1982 The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Caplan, David, Baker, Carol, and Dehaut, Francis 1985 Syntactic Determinants of Sentence Comprehension in Aphasia. Cognition 21:117–175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caplan, David, and Hildebrandt, Nancy 1988 Disorders of Syntactic Comprehension. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1981 Lectures in Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1982 Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter W., Wasow, Tom, and Akmajian, Adrian, eds. 1977 Formal Syntax. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, George A. 1981 Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education, 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Goodglass, Harold 1973 Studies on the Grammar of Aphasies. Pp. 183–218 in Psycholinguistics and Aphaiia. Goodglass, Harold and Blumstein, Sheila, eds. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Goodglass, Harold, and Blumstein, Sheila, eds. 1973 Psycholinguistics and Aphasia. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Goodglass, Harold, and Berko, Jean 1960 Agrammatism and Inflectional Morphology in English. J. Speech and Hearing Research 3:257–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grodzinsky, Yosef 1984 The Syntactic Characterization of Agrammatism. Cognition 16:99–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grodzinsky, Yosef 1986 Language Deficits and the Theory of Syntax. Brain and Language 27:135–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jakubowicz, Celia 1984 On Markedness and Binding Principles. In Proceedings of NELS 14. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Kean, Marie-Louise 1977 The Linguistic Interpretation of Aphasic Syndromes. Cognition 5:9–46.Google Scholar
Kean, Marie-Louise 1980 Grammatical Representations and the Description of Language Processing. Pp. 239–268 in Biological Studies of Mental Processes. Caplan, David, ed. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kean, Marie-Louise 1982 Three Perspectives for the Analysis of Aphasic Syndromes. Pp. 173–202 in Neural Models of Language Processes. Arbib, Michael A., Caplan, David, and Marshall, J.C., eds. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kean, Marie-Louise 1985 Agrammatism. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lapointe, Steven G. 1980 Some Issues in the Linguistic Description of Agrammatism. Cognition 14:1–39.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth, and Rappaport, Marylin 1986 The Formation of Lexical Passives. Linguistic Inquiry 17:623–661.Google Scholar
Luria, Alexander R. 1970 Traumatic Aphasia. The Hague: Mouton. Reprinted in translation. [Originally published 1947 in Russian.]Google Scholar
Luria, Alexander R. 1972 The Working Brain. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. 1985 Two Notes on the Linguistic Interpretation of Broca’s Aphasia. Pp. 153–164 in Agrammatism. Kean, Marie Louise, ed. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wasow, Tom 1977 Transformations and the Lexicon. Pp. 327–360 in Formal Syntax. Culicover, Peter W., Wasow, Tom, and Akmajian, Adrian, eds. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar