Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:52:05.197Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dirk Geeraerts, Stefan Grondelaers, et Peter Bakema. The Structure of Lexical Variation: Meaning, Naming, and Context. Dans la collection Cognitive Linguistics Research 5. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 1994. Pp. 221. DM 128,-(relié).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Bert Peeters
Bert Peeters*
Affiliation:
University of Tasmania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews/Comptes rendus
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , September 1997 , pp. 358 - 361
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Références

Allan, Keith. 1995. What names tell about the lexicon and the encyclopedia. Lexicology 1:280–325.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk. 1993. Vagueness’s puzzles, polysemy’s vagaries. Cognitive Linguistics 4:223–272.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk. 1994. Classical definability and the monosemic bias. Rivista di linguistica 6:189–207.Google Scholar
Peeters, Bert. 1991. More about axiological fields. Revue canadienne de linguistique 36:113–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peeters, Bert. 1993. Conceptual axiology and axiological fields. In Studien zur Wort-feldtheoriel Studies in lexical field theory, sous la dir. Lutzeier, de Peter Rolf, 175–183. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Peeters, Bert. 1996a. Nouveaux regards sur la problématique des cases vides. In Lexical structures and language use, vol. 1, sous la dir. Weigand, d’ Edda et Hundsnurscher, Franz, 255–264. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Peeters, Bert. 1996b. Language and the mind. On concepts and values. Pragmatics and Cognition 4:139–152.Google Scholar
Ruhl, Charles. 1989. On monosemy: A study in linguistic semantics. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1996. Semantics: Primes and universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar