Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T19:24:14.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

April McMahon. Lexical Phonology and the History of English. In the series Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2000. Pp. xi + 309. US$64.95 (hardcover).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

John T. Jensen
John T. Jensen*
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews/Comptes rendus
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 48 , Issue 1-2 , June 2003 , pp. 82 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archangeli, Diana. 1984. Underspecification in Yawelmani Phonology and Morphology. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Archangeli, Diana. 1988. Aspects of underspecification theory. Phonology 5:183–207.Google Scholar
Borowsky, Toni Jean. 1986. Topics in the Lexical Phonology of English. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. [Reprinted 1990, New York: Garland.]Google Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1962. Phonology in generative grammar. Word 18:54–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris, and Mohanan, K.P.. 1985. Segmental phonology of modern English. Linguistic Inquiry 16:57–116.Google Scholar
King, Robert D. 1969. Historical linguistics and generative grammar. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1968. How abstract is phonology. Distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club. Bloomington, Indiana. [Reprinted with slight revisions in 1982a.]Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982a. How abstract is phonology? In Explanation in Phonology, ed. Kiparsky, Paul, 119–163. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982b. Lexical morphology and phonology. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, ed. Yang, I.S., 3–91. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Makkai, Valerie Becker, ed. 1972. Phonological theory: evolution and current practice. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 1991. Synchronie rule inversion. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, ed. Sutton, Laurel A., Johnson, Christopher, with Shields, Ruth, 192–207.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J., and Taub, Alison. 1992. Review of Paradis, Carole and Prunet, Jean-François, eds., The special status of coronals: Internal and external evidence. Phonology 9:363–370.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul. 1968. Aspect of phonological theory. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar