Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T09:27:04.192Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Word Stress, Sentence Stress and Syllable Prominence in Nova Scotia Acadian French

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Phyllis Wrenn*
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University

Extract

The prosody of Acadian French has received relatively little attention in formal analyses of the dialect, though few who are acquainted with this variety of French, whether linguist or not, would hesitate to give an impressionistic judgement when asked to describe it. The delivery (débit) is characteristically slow, the melody “chantante” (‘singsong’). V. Lucci (1972:121) attributes this impression to the large number of accents, represented by repeated short, rapid rises in pitch. At the same time, he notes a feature that has been referred to in other descriptions of Canadian varieties of French (cf.J.-D. Gendron 1966:142–146; M. Boudreault 1968:87–99) that results in rhythmic patterns not encountered, in theory, in standard French. This dialectal feature is pretonic syllable lengthening, which, according to Lucci, although it appears to be an accent, is in reality a preaccent, the articulatory strengthening of the syllable preceding the accented syllable, which, of course, is the final one. This feature, whether in Acadian or in other varieties of French (cf. F. Carton 1980:85), is in fact generally ascribed to the durational characteristics of the vowel; whether or not the resulting syllable prominence should be interpreted as accent (displacement of the tonic accent, pretonic stress) has been a matter of dispute. Both Boudreault and Gendron, it is true, in describing the phenomenon, refrain for the most part from referring either to syllable prominence (perceptual judgement or physical measurement) or to accent. The former, however, does attribute one group of examples to the presence of an accent d’insistance; these examples are, in fact, stressable monosyllables, pretonic in the word group. The remainder, according to him, are a residue of intrinsic, etymologically motivated vowel length, the explanation preferred by Gendron. According to Gendron, the tonic accent still falls on the final syllable, although it is weak (in relation to a stronger pretonic syllable), and he criticizes J.-P. Vinay (1955:75), who speaks of displacement of the tonic accent.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, W.S. 1973 Accent and Rhythm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beaudry, R. 1955 Etat actuel des recherches sur le parler acadien. Pp. 99110 in Etudes sur le parler français au Canada. Québec: Presses de l’Université Laval.Google Scholar
Boudreault, M. 1968 Rythme et mélodie de la phrase parlée en France et au Québec. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Carton, F. 1980 L’accentuation dans le français dialectal du nord de la France. Pp. 6592 in L’accent en français contemporain, Studia Phonetica 15 Fonágy, I. and Léon, P., eds. Montréal: Didier.Google Scholar
Fonágy, I. 1980 L’accent français: accent probabilitaire. Pp. 123233 in L’accent en français contemporain, Studia Phonetica 15 Fonágy, I. and Léon, P., eds. Montréal: Didier.Google Scholar
Fouché, P. 1952 Phonétique historique du français. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Gendron, J.-D. 1966 Tendances phonétiques du français parlé au Canada. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Grammont, M. 1965 Traité de phonétique. (8th éd.) Paris: Delagrave.Google Scholar
Lucci, V. 1972 Phonologie de l’acadien, Studia Phonetica 7. Montréal: Didier.Google Scholar
Lucci, V. 1980 L’accent didactique. Pp. 107121 in L’accent en français contemporain, Studia Phonetica 15. Montréal: Didier.Google Scholar
Martin, Ph. 1980a Sur les principes d’une théorie syntaxique de l’intonation. Pp. 91101 in Problèmes de prosodie, vol. 1: Approches théoriques, Studia Phonetica 17. Montréal: Didier.Google Scholar
Martin, Ph. 1980b Une théorie syntaxique de l’accentuation en français. Pp. 112 in L’accent en français contemporain, Studia Phonetica 15. Montréal: Didier.Google Scholar
Rossi, M. 1980a Le cadre accentuel et le mot en italien et en français. Pp. 922 in Problèmes en prosodie, vol.1: Approches théoriques, Studia Phonetica 17. Montréal: Didier.Google Scholar
Rossi, M. 1980b Le français, langue sans accent? Pp. 1351 in L’accent en français contemporain, Studia Phonetica 15. Montréal: Didier.Google Scholar
Séguinot, A. 1977 L’accent d’insistance en français standard. Pp. 158 in L’accent d’insistance/Emphatic Stress, Studia Phonetica 12. Montréal: Didier.Google Scholar
Vinay, J.-P. 1955 Aperçu des études de phonétique canadienne. Pp. 6182 in Etudes sur le parler français au Canada. Presses de l’Université Laval.Google Scholar
Walker, D. 1975 Word Stress in French. Language 51:887900.Google Scholar
Wrenn, P. 1981 Allophonic Variation of /e/ and its Morphologization in an Acadian Dialect of Nova Scotia. Language and Speech 24:327347.Google Scholar