Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:28:06.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tlingit: An Object-Initial Language?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Matthew S. Dryer*
Affiliation:
University of Alberta

Extract

A number of early grammatical descriptions of Tlingit, a non-Athapaskan Na-Dene language spoken in southeast Alaska and in adjacent areas of Canada, describe the language as being OSV. Evidence is presented in this paper that Tlingit is not OSV.

Until recent years, it was thought that of the six logically possible word orders of subject, verb, and object, only SOV, SVO, VSO, and VOS existed. (See for example Pullum 1977). Since then, however, evidence for the existence of object-initial languages has been presented by Derbyshire (1977) and Derbyshire and Pullum (1981). Almost all of the object-initial languages discussed by Derbyshire and Pullum are spoken in or near the Amazon basin in South America. There is to date no clear case of an object-initial language spoken outside of South America.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boas, Franz 1917 Grammatical Notes on the Language of the Tlingit Indians. University of Pennsylvania University Museum Anthropological Publications 8:1.Google Scholar
Derbyshire, Desmond 1977 Word Order Universals and the Existence of OVS Languages. Linguistic Inquiry 8:590598.Google Scholar
Derbyshire, Desmond, and Pullum, Geoffrey 1981 Object-Initial Languages. IJAL 47:192214.Google Scholar
Eastman, Carol M. 1979 Word Order in Haida. IJAL 45:141148.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963 Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements. Pp. 73113 in Universals of Language. Greenberg, Joseph, ed. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1983 Word Order Universals. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Livingston F. 1914 A Study of the Thlingets of Alaska. New York: Revell, Fleming H.. [Reprinted 1970 by Johnson Reprint Corp., New York.]Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward 1978 The Syntax of Subject-Final Languages. In Syntactic Typology. Lehmann, Winfred, ed. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, William A., and Willard, Frances H. 1904 Grammar and Vocabulary of the Hlingĭl Language of Southeastern Alaska. (Original publication unknown. Reprinted 1971 by The Shorey Book Store, Seattle.)Google Scholar
Krause, Aurel 1885 Die Tlinkit-Indianer. Jena: [publisher unknown]. Trans, by Gunther, Erna: The Tlingit Indians. Seattle: The University of Washington Press [1956].Google Scholar
La Grasserie, Raoul de 1902 Cinq Langues de la Colombie Britannique. Paris: J. Maisonneuve.Google Scholar
Merlan, Francesca 1982 Mangarayi. Lingua Descriptive Studies 4.Google Scholar
Naish, Constance 1979 A Syntactic Study of Tlingit. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Olson, R.L. 1967 Social Structure and Social Life of the Tlingit of Alaska. Anthropological Records, Volume 26. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1977 Word Order Universals and Grammatical Relations. In Syntax and Semantics Vol. 8: Grammatical Relations. Cole, Peter and Sadock, Jerrold M., eds. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Story, Gillian 1979 A Morphological Study of Tlingit. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Swanton, John R. 1909 Tlingit Myths and Texts. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 39. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Swanton, John 1911 Tlingit. Pp. 159204 in Handbook of American Indian Languages Part 1. Boas, Franz, ed. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 40. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Tomlin, Russell 1979 An Explanation of the Distribution of Basic Constituent Orders. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar