Article contents
Some social aspects of paralanguage*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 June 2016
Extract
The term ‘paralanguage’ and the corresponding adjective ‘paralinguistic’ are less than ten years old but already they loom large in the study of animal communication. In one sense all non-language communications (kinesics, haptics, as well as “vocalization”) are paralinguistic but this term is now almost exclusively applied to significant, non-linguistic noises made with the vocal tract. Observations of these phenomena are of course quite old. Demosthenes undoubtedly studied “delivery” and “tone of voice.” There are pre-Christian statements on phonology also, but no systematic study of that subject antedates that of Grimm in 1819, and that was a lucky forerunner. Actual investigation of phonology as structure, as patterns in a system, began with Ferdinand De Saussure late in the nineteenth and early in the twentieth century. The first systematic study of paralanguage was by Henry Lee Smith, Jr. in a paper called “The Communication Situation,” mimeographed for the Foreign Service Institute of the United States Department of State in 1950. This was later expanded into “An Outline of Metalinguistic Analysis” in the 1952 Georgetown Round Table Conference on Linguistics and Language Study. Smith did not use the term ‘paralanguage,’ however, but ‘vocalization,’ subdivided into ‘vocal qualifiers’ and ‘vocal modifiers.’ Paralanguage became established with the most complete study to date, the 1958 article by George L. Trager “Paralanguage: A Preliminary Statement.” Other writers in the field are Norman A. McQuown and Charles F. Hockett. This study is more systematic than that of Smith and less complex than that of Trager. The infancy of the field, I think, warrants various approaches.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , Fall 1965 , pp. 31 - 39
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1965
Footnotes
This study was made possible by a grant from the Office of the United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
References
1 The bibliography on paralanguage is: Henry Lee Smith, Jr., “The Communication Situation,” United States Department of State mimeographed paper; “An Outline of Metalinguistic Analysis,” Georgetown Round Table Conference on Linguistics and Language Study, 1952; and Pittenger, Robert E.: “A Basis for Some Contributions of Linguistics to Psychiatry,” Psychiatry, 20 (1957), 61–78 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; McQuown, Norman A., “Linguistics Transcription and Specification of Psychiatric Interview Materials,” Psychiatry, 20 (1957), 79–86 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Trager, George L., “Paralanguage: A First Approximation,” Studies in Linguistics, 13 (1958), 1–12 Google Scholar; Pittenger, Robert E., Hockett, Charles F., Donehy, John J., The First Five Minutes (1960), especially pp. 185–200 Google Scholar.
2 Op. cit. p. 11.
3 Charles F. Hockett, A Course in Modern Linguistics, p. 575.
4 From a taped interview between J. Willis, a Negro graduate student in anthropology at the University of Chicago, and C.O.M., a lower-class Negro from southern Illinois, now living in Chicago.
- 14
- Cited by