Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T13:23:37.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Robert D. Borsley and Ian Roberts, eds. The Syntax of the Celtic Languages: A Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1996. Pp. viii + 368. US$59.95 (hardcover).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Máire B. Noonan*
Affiliation:
Université du Québec à Montréal and Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews/Comptes rendus
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chomsky, Noam. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In The view from Building 20, ed. Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, Samuel J., 151. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra, and Pianesi, Fabio. 1992. From semantic representations to morphosyntactic structures. Paper read at Going Romance, Utrecht.Google Scholar
Guéron, Jacqueline, and Teun, Hoekstra. 1988. T-chains and the constituent structure of auxiliaries. In Constituent structure, ed. Cardinaletti, Anna, Cinque, Guglielmo and Giusti, Giuliana, 3599. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Noonan, Máire. 1994. VP internal and VP external AGROP: Evidence from Irish. In Proceedings of WCCFL 13, ed. Aranovich, Raul et al., 318333. Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1996. Some optimality principles of sentence pronunciation. Ms., MIT.Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa. 1992. Notes on Case and expletives: A discussion of Lasnik’s paper. Ms., McGill University.Google Scholar