We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Rajendra Singh, Jurgen Pesot, John Reighard, and Etienne Tiffou, eds. Modern Studies in Sanskrit. Part I. Series in Indian Languages and Literatures 17. New Delhi: Bahri Publications. 1988. Pp. xii + 221. Rupees 200.
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
27 June 2016
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Borowsky, Toni, and Mester, Rolf-Armin1983Aspiration to Roots: Remarks on the Sanskrit Diaspirates. Pp. 52–63 in Papers from the 19th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chukerman, Amy, Marks, Mitchell, and Richardson, John F., eds. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans H.1983Language-Death Phenomena in Sanskrit: Grammatical Evidence for Attrition in Contemporary Spoken Sanskrit. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences13:21–35.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans H., ed. 1991Studies in Sanskrit Syntax. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans H., and Pandharipande, Rajeshwari1976The Sociolinguistic Position of Sanskrit in Pre-Muslim South Asia. Studies in Language Learning1:105–138.Google Scholar
Janda, Richard D., and Joseph, Brian D.1989In Further Defense of a Non-Phonological Account for Sanskrit Root-Initial Aspiration Alternations. Pp. 246–260 in Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics. Powers, Joyce and de Jong, Kenneth, eds. Columbus: Department of Linguistics, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Sag, Ivan A.1976Pseudosolutions to the Pseudoparadox: Sanskrit Diaspirates Revisited. Linguistic Inquiry7:609–622.Google Scholar
Schindler, Jochem1976Diachronie and Synchronie Remarks on Bartholomae’s and Grass-mann’s Laws. Linguistic Inquiry7:622–637.Google Scholar