Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:34:05.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The problem of conventionality in the development of creole morphological systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Carla L. Hudson Kam  and
Whitney Goodrich Smith
Carla L. Hudson Kam
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
Whitney Goodrich Smith
Affiliation:
University of Maryland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Squib/Notule
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 56 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 109 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association/Association canadienne de linguistique 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arends, Jacques. 1993. Towards a gradualist model of creolization. In Atlantic meets Pacific: A global view of pidginization and creolization, ed. Byrne, Frances and Holm, John, 371–380. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Art Explosion. 2004. [Computer software]. Calabasas, CA: Nova Development.Google Scholar
Bloom, Lois, Lifter, Karin, and Hafitz, Jeremie. 1980. Semantics of verbs and the development of verb inflection in child language. Language 56:386–412.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Levinson, Stephen C.. 1993. Linguistic and nonlinguistic coding of spatial arrays: Explorations in Mayan cognition (Working Paper No. 24). Nijmegen: Cognitive Anthropology Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Buresh, Jennifer Sootsman and Woodward, Amanda L.. 2007. Infants track action goals within and across agents. Cognition 104:287–314.Google Scholar
Clark, Eve V. 1987. The principle of contrast: A constraint on language acquisition. In Mechanisms of language acquisition, ed. MacWhinney, Brian, 1–33. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Clark, Eve V. 1993. The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coppola, Marie E. 2002. The emergence of grammatical categories in home sign: Evidence from family-based gesture systems in Nicaragua. Doctoral dissertation, University of Rochester.Google Scholar
Coppola, Marie and So, Wing Chee. 2005. Abstract and object-anchored deixis: Pointing and spatial layout in adult homesign systems in Nicaragua. In Proceedings of the Boston University Conference on Language Development 29, vol. 1, ed. Brugos, Alejna, Clark-Cotton, Manuella R., and Ha, Seungwan, 144–155. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Corriveau, Kathleen H., Fusaro, Maria, and Harris, Paul L.. 2009. Going with the flow: Preschoolers prefer nondissenters as informants. Psychological Science 20:372–377.Google Scholar
DeGraff, Michel A.F. 2001. Morphology in creole genesis: A prolegomenon. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, ed. Kenstowicz, Michael, 53–121. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan. 1997. When gesture and words speak differently. Current Directions in Psychological Science 6:138–143.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan. 2003a. Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan. 2003b. The resilience of language: What gesture creation in deaf children can tell us about how all children learn language. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan. 2005. What language creation in the manual modality tells us about the foundations of language. The Linguistic Review 22:199–225.Google Scholar
Goodrich, Whitney. 2009. Gesture as input in language acquisition: Learning ‘who she is’ from ‘where she is.’ Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Goodrich, Whitney and Kam, Carla L. Hudson. 2007. Pointing to ‘her’: The effect of co-speech gesture on pronoun comprehension. Paper presented at the 20th Annual CUNY conference on human sentence processing, La Jolla, CA.Google Scholar
Goodrich Smith, Whitney and Kam, Carla L. Hudson. 2010. Pointing to ‘her’: The effect of co-speech gesture on pronoun resolution. Ms., University of Maryland and University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Graham, Susan A., Stock, Hayli, and Henderson, Annette M.E.. 2006. Nineteen-month-olds’ understanding of the conventionality of object labels versus desires. Infancy 9:341–350.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. 1960. The origin of speech. Scientific American 203:88–96.Google Scholar
Hudson, Carla L. 2004. Review of Michael Tomasello, Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. PsycCRITIQUES: Contemporary Psychology — APA Review of Books 49 (Suppl. 14), Article 66.Google Scholar
Hudson Kam, Carla L. and Newport, Elissa L.. 2005. Regularizing unpredictable variation: The roles of adult and child learners in language formation and change. Language Learning and Development 1:151–195.Google Scholar
Hudson Kam, Carla L. and Newport, Elissa L.. 2009. Getting it right by getting it wrong: When learners change languages. Cognitive Psychology 59:30–66.Google Scholar
Kegl, Judy and McWhorter, John. 1997. Perspectives on an Emerging Language. In Proceedings of the Twenty-eighth Annual Stanford Child Language Research Forum, ed. Clark, Eve V., 15–36. Palo Alto, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
LeFebvre, Claire. 2003. The emergence of productive morphology in creole languages: The case of Haitian Creole. In Yearbook of morphology 2002, Part I, ed. Booij, Geert, Marley, Jap Van, and Plag, Ingo (Guest Editor), 35–80. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Li, Peggy and Gleitman, Lila. 2002. Turning the tables: Language and spatial reasoning. Cognition 83:265–294.Google Scholar
McNeill, David. 1992. Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, David. 2005. Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2010. SLA and the emergence of creoles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32:359–400.Google Scholar
Newport, Elissa L. 1990. Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science 14:11–28.Google Scholar
Newport, Elissa L. and Supalla, Ted. 2000. Sign language research at the millennium. In The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, ed. Emmory, Karen and Lane, Harlan L., 103–114. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Onishi, Kristine H. and Baillargeon, Renee. 2005. Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs? Science 308:255–258.Google Scholar
Padden, Carol. 1983. Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Park-Doob, Mischa A. 2010. Gesturing through time: Holds and intermodal timing in the stream of speech. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo, ed. 2003. The morphology of creole languages. Special section of Yearbook of morphology 2002. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo. 2006. Morphology in pidgins and creoles. In The encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2nd ed., ed. Brown, Keith, 304–308. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Pyers, Jennie E. and Senghas, Ann. 2007. Reported action in Nicaraguan and American Sign Languages: Emerging versus established systems. In Visible variation: Comparative studies on sign language structure, ed. Perniss, Pamela, Pfau, Roland, and Steinbach, Markus, 279–302. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pyers, Jennie E., Shusterman, Anna, Senghas, Ann, Spelke, Elizabeth E., and Emmory, Karen. 2010. Evidence from an emerging sign language reveals that language supports spatial cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 107:12116–12120.Google Scholar
Sabbagh, Mark A. and Henderson, Annette M.E.. 2007. How an appreciation of conventionality shapes early word learning. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 115:25–37.Google Scholar
Senghas, Ann. 1995. Children’s contribution to the birth of Nicaraguan Sign Language. Doctoral dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Senghas, Ann. 2003. Intergenerational influence and ontogenetic development in the emergence of spatial grammar in Nicaraguan Sign Language. Cognitive Development 18:511–531.Google Scholar
Senghas, Ann and Coppola, Marie. 2001. Children creating language: How Nicaraguan Sign Language acquired a spatial grammar. Psychological Science 12:323–328.Google Scholar
Senghas, Richard J. and Monaghan, Leila. 2002. Signs of their times: Deaf communities and the culture of language. Annual Review of Anthropology 31:69–97.Google Scholar
Senghas, Richard J., Senghas, Ann, and Pyers, Jennie E.. 2005. The emergence of Nicaraguan Sign Language: Questions of development, acquisition, and evolution. In Biology and knowledge revisited: From neurogenesis to psychogenesis, ed. Parker, Sue Taylor, Langer, Jonas, and Milbrath, Constance, 287–306. Mahwah, NJ: Earlbaum.Google Scholar
So, Wing Chee, Coppola, Marie, Licciardello, Vincent, and Goldin-Meadow, Susan. 2005. The seeds of spatial grammar in the manual modality. Cognitive Science 29:1029–1043.Google Scholar
So, Wing Chee, Kita, Sotaro, and Goldin-Meadow, Susan. 2009. Using the hands to identify who does what to whom: Gesture and speech go hand-in-hand. Cognitive Science 33:115–125.Google Scholar
Supalla, Ted. 1982. Structure and acquisition of verbs of motion and location in American Sign Language. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a language: A usage based theory of acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wellman, Henry M. 1990. The child’s theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar