Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T22:47:02.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Presupposition and the delimitation of semantics, by Ruth M. Kempson. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975. Pp. xi, 235.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Joseph L. Subbiondo
Joseph L. Subbiondo*
Affiliation:
University of Santa Clara
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews/Comptes rendus
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 23 , Issue 1-2 , Spring/Fall 1978 , pp. 170 - 174
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austin, J. L. 1962 How to do Things with Words. Clarendon Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua 1954 Indexical expressions. Mind 63.359–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bierwisch, Manfred 1969 On certain problems of semantic representation. Foundations of Language 5.153–84. 1971 On classifying semantic features. In Steinberg, 410–35.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard 1933 Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1969 Types of lexical information. In Kiefer, F., ed. Studies in Syntax and Semantics. Dordrecht, 109–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1971 Verbs of judging: an exercise in semantic description. In Fillmore, C. J. and Langendoen, D. T., eds. Studies in Linguistic Semantics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 273–89.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. 1957 Meaning. The Philosophical Review 62.377–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P. 1969 Utterer’s meaning and intentions. The Philosophical Review 78.147–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri 1973 Presuppositions of compound sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 4, 169–93.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. 1964 Analyticity and contradiction in natural language. In Fodor, J. and Katz, J., eds. The Structure of Language. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 519–43.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. & Langendoen, D. Terence 1976 Pragmatics and presupposition. Lg. 52.1–17.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul & Kiparsky, Carol 1970 Fact. In Bierwisch, M. and Heidolph, K., eds. Progress in Linguistics. The Hague: Mouton. 143–73.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George N. 1971 Presupposition and relative well-formedness. In Steinberg, 329–40.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin 1971 IPs, and’s, and but’s about conjunction. In Fillmore and Langendoen, 115–50.Google Scholar
Montague, R. 1972 Pragmatics and intensional logic. In Harman, G. and Davidson, D., eds. Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht: Reidel, 152–68.Google Scholar
Morris, Charles W. 1938 Foundations of the theory of signs. In International Encyclopedia of Unified Science I. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Morris, Charles W. 1946 Signs, Language, and Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand 1905 On denoting. Mind 14.479–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert C. 1972 Pragmatics. In Harman, 380–97.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Danny D. & Jakobovits, Leon A. 1971 Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics, and psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1950 On referring. Mind 59.320–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1952 Introduction to Logical Theory. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1964 Identifying reference and truth values. Theoria 30, 96–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar