Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T11:55:23.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perspective psycholinguistique de l’apprentissage de la grammaire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Renzo Titone
Renzo Titone*
Affiliation:
Georgetown University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Un modèle psycho-linguistique adéquat de la grammaire doit rendre compte de l’apprentissage des structures grammaticales (point de vue diachronique) et de l’encodage et du décodage de ces structures (point de vue séquentiel). Le premier est un problème d’ordre génétique, le deuxième d’ordre fonctionnel; notre discussion sera axée sur cette distinction.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , Spring 1969 , pp. 123 - 132
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliographie

Allport, F. H. (1924), Social Psychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Allport, G. W. (1961), Pattern and Growth in Personality. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Ausubel, D. P. (1963), The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
Ausubel, D. P. (1964), “A cognitive structure view of word and concept meaning,” in Anderson, R. C., and Ausubel, D. P., Readings in the psychology of cognition. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Barrutia, R. (1966), “Some pedagogical dangers in recent linguistic trends,” in International Review of Applied Linguistics, IV, 1966, 3, 157–64.Google Scholar
Belyayev, B. V. (1963), The Psychology of Teaching Foreign Languages. Trans. from the Russian. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1933), Language. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Bohlen, A. (1963), Methodik des neusprachlichen Unterrichts. Heidelberg: Quelle und Meyer.Google Scholar
Brooks, N. (1960), Language and Language Learning. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1939), “Determining and numerating adjectives in children’s speech,” Child Development, 10, 215–29.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1958), “A factor analysis of two foreign language aptitude batteries,” Journal of General Psychology, 59, 3–19.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1961), “Language development in children,” in Saporta, S. (ed.), Psycholinguistics. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Chomsky, K. (1957), Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, K. (1965), Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Google Scholar
Closset, F. (1953), Didactique des langues vivantes. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar
Cousinet, R. (1950), “La grammaire et l’orthographe,” L’Ecole Nouvelle Française, Octobre, 13.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1966), “How to learn to talk: some simple ways,” in Smith, F., and Miller, G. A., The Genesis of Language. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T., 105–122.Google Scholar
Galichet, G. (1949), Physiologie de la langue française. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Galichet, G. (1950), Essai de grammaire psychologique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Galichet, G. (1953), Méthodologie grammaticale. Etude psychologique des structures. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Gleason, H. A. (1961), An Introduction to Descriptive Linguistics. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Guillaume, p. (1927), Les débuts de la phrase dans le langage de l’enfant, Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique, 24, 1–25.Google Scholar
Gunter, H., and Scherer, A. (1956), Grundfragen der Sprachwissenschaft. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer.Google Scholar
Gurrey, p. (1962), Teaching English grammar. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. J. (1965), “Mediation theory and grammatical behavior,” in Rosenberg, S. (ed.), Directions in Psycholinguistics. New York: Macmillan, 66–96.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1958), The Philosophy of Grammar. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Johnson, F. S. (1967), Grammars: a working classification, Elementary English (Milwaukee), 44, 4, 349–52.Google Scholar
Kainz, F. (1956), Psychologie der Sprache. Stuttgart: Encke, vol. IV.Google Scholar
Kantor, J. R. (1922), An Objective Psychology of Grammar. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Publications.Google Scholar
Lashley, K. S. (1951), “The problem of serial order in behavior,” in Jeffress, L. A. (ed.), Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior. New York: Wiley, 112–36. Reprinted in Saporta, S. (ed.), Psycholinguistics. New York: Holt, 1961, 180-98.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. (1965), “Some psychological studies of grammar,” in Anderson, R. C., and Ausubel, D. P., Readings in the Psychology of Cognition. New York: Holt, 312–49.Google Scholar
Nuttin, J. (1953), Tâche, réussite et échec. Louvain, Belgium: Nauwelaerts.Google Scholar
Roberts, A. D. (1948), “Language of grammar?,” Modern Language Journal, 32, 125–29.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. (1949), Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Saussure, F. (1960), Cours de linguistique generale. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1957), Verbal Behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Titone, R. (1964a), La psicolinguistica oggi. Roma: PAS.Google Scholar
Titone, R. (1964b), Studies in the Psychology of Second Language Learning. Rome: PAS.Google Scholar
Weiss, A. p. (1925), “Linguistics and psychology,” Language, 1, 52–57.Google Scholar
Wittwer, J. (1959), Les fonctions grammaticales chez l’enfant. Neuchâtel, Switzerland: Delachaux et Niestle.Google Scholar