Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T11:03:18.373Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Michael Hammond. The Phonology of English: A Prosodic Optimality-Theoretic Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1999. Pp. xvi + 368. US$49.50 (softcover).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

John T. Jensen*
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews/Comptes rendus
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borowsky, Toni. 1986. Topics in the lexical phonology of English. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Borowsky, Toni, Itô, Junko, and Mester, Ralf-Armin. 1984. The formal representation of ambisyllabicity: Evidence from Danish. NELS 14:3448.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1964. Current issues in linguistic theory. Mouton: The Hague.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1959. The sound pattern of Russian. Mouton: The Hague.Google Scholar
Jensen, John T. 2000. Against ambisyllabicity. Phonology 17:187235.Google Scholar
Kahn, Daniel. 1976. Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1979. Metrical structure assignment is cyclic. Linguistic Inquiry 10:421–441.Google Scholar
Malécot, André. 1960. Vowel nasality as a distinctive feature in American English. Language 36:222229.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J., and Prince, Alan S.. 1993. Generalized alignment. Yearbook of Morphology 1993:79153.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J., and Prince, Alan S.. 1995. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18: Papers in Optimality Theory, ed. Beekman, Jill, Dickey, Laura and Urbanczyk, Suzanne, 249384. Graduate Linguistics Students Association, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina, and Vogel, Irene. 1986. Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan S., and Smolensky, Paul. 1993. Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms., Rutgers University and University of Colorado, Boulder.Google Scholar
Sagey, Elizabeth Caroline. 1986. The representation of features and relations in nonlinear phonology. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1982. The syllable. In The structure of phonological representations (Part II), ed. van der Hulst, Harry and Smith, Norval, 337384. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Withgott, Mary Margaret. 1982. Segmental evidence for phonological constituents. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar