Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:07:51.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Loanword Adaptation in Lama: Testing the TCRS Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Charles H. Ulrich
Charles H. Ulrich*
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

When words are borrowed from one language into another, they are often adapted to conform with the phonological constraints of the borrowing language. This article looks at the adaptation of six hundred loanwords from French and English into Lama in light of the predictions of the Theory of Constraints and Repair Strategies. The Lama data support the Minimality Principle, which predicts that ill-formed structures will be repaired as economically as possible, and the Preservation Principle, which predicts that epenthesis will be favoured over deletion. They also support the claim that the form in which loanwords are stored in the borrowing language is equivalent to the output of the phonology of the source language, even when that includes segments which are ill-formed in the borrowing language. However, the Lama data do not support the Threshold Principle, which predicts deletion when adaptation would be too costly.

Résumé

Résumé

Lorsque les mots d’une langue sont empruntés à une autre, ils sont souvent adaptés pour obéir aux contraintes phonologiques de la langue emprunteuse. Cet article examine l’adaptation de 600 mots français et anglais en lama à la lumière des prédictions de la théorie des contraintes et stratégies de réparation. Le corpus lama soutient le Principe de minimalité, qui prédit que les structures mal formées seront réparées aussi économiquement que possible. Il soutient aussi le Principe de préservation, qui prédit que l’insertion est préférable à l’élision. Il soutient également la proposition que la forme dans laquelle les mots d’emprunt sont conservés dans la langue emprunteuse est équivalente à l’output de la phonologie de la langue source, même quand cela inclut des segments qui sont mal formés dans la langue emprunteuse. Mais le corpus lama ne soutient pas le Principe du seuil de tolérance, qui prédit l’élision lorsque l’adaptation serait trop coûteuse.

Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , December 1997 , pp. 415 - 463
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Béland, Renée, Paradis, Carole, and Bois, Monique. 1993. Constraints and repairs in aphasie speech: A group study. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 38: Constraint-based theories in multilinear phonology, ed. Paradis, Carole and LaCharité, Dartene, 279–302.Google Scholar
Brinneman, Neal. 1986. La phonologie du lama. Ms., Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Brinneman, Neal. 1993. Liste de contrôle pour la traduction des noms propres du Nouveau Testament. Ms., Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Brinneman, Neal, and Brinneman, Carol. 1995. Dictionnaire lama-français. Ms., Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Dutton, Kenneth. 1968. Spoken French: A guide to phonetic theory and practice. Sydney: Ian Novak.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko, and Mester, R. Armin. 1995. Japanese phonology. In The handbook of phonological theory, ed. Goldsmith, John A., 817–838. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan D., and Lowenstamm, Jean. 1984. De la syllabicaté. In Forme sonore du langage, ed. Dell, François, Hirst, Daniel, and Vergnaud, Jean-Roger, 123–159. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
LaCharité, Darlene, and Paradis, Carole. 1993. Introduction: The emergence of constraints in generative phonology and a comparison of three current constraint-based models. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 38: Constraint-based theories in multilinear phonology, ed. Paradis, Carole and LaCharité, Darlene, 127–153.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 1982. A course in phonetics. 2nd ed. York, New: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Manessy, Gabriel. 1979. Contribution à la classification généalogique des langues voltaïques: le groupe Proto-Central. Paris: SELAF.Google Scholar
Ourso, Méterwa A. 1987. Constraints on borrowing and nativization. Paper read at the Annual Conference on African Linguistics, Montréal.Google Scholar
Ourso, Méterwa A. 1988. Root control, underspecification, and ATR harmony. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 18:111–127.Google Scholar
Ourso, Méterwa A. 1989. Lama phonology and morphology. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Ourso, Méterwa A., and Ulrich, Charles H.. 1990. Sonorant-strengthening in Lama. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 20:135–147.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carole. 1993. Ill-formedness in the dictionary: A source of constraint violation. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 38: Constraint-based theories in multilinear phonology, ed. Paradis, Carole and LaCharité, Darlene, 215–234.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carole. 1996. The inadequacy of filters and faithfulness in loanword adaptation. In Current trends in phonology: Models and methods, ed. Durand, Jacques and Laks, Bernard, 509–534. European Studies Research Institute, University of Salford.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carole, and LaCharité, Darlene. 1997. Preservation and minimality in loanword adaptation. Journal of Linguistics 33:379–430.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carole, and Lebel, Caroline. 1994. Contrasts from segmental parameter settings in loanwords: Core and periphery in Quebec French. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 13:75–94.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carole, and Prunet, Jean-François, eds. 1991. Phonetics and phonology 2: The special status of coronals: Internal and external evidence . San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rose, Yvan. 1995. Minimalité, préservation et tolérance dans les emprunts français en kinyarwanda. Master’s thesis, Université Laval.Google Scholar
Rose, Yvan. 1997. Can phonology count? In Proceedings of the 1997 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, ed. Blair, L. et al., 215–226. Calgary Working Papers in Linguistics, University of Calgary.Google Scholar
Rose, Yvan. 1998. A structural account of segmental deletion in loanword phonology. Ms., McGill University.Google Scholar
Roy, Marie-Josée. 1992. Le rôle des contraintes phonologiques dans l’adaptation d’emprunts anglais en français québécois. Master’s thesis, Université Laval.Google Scholar
Silverman, Daniel. 1992. Multiple scansions in loanword phonology: Evidence from Cantonese. Phonology 9:289–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulrich, Charles H. 1991. Underlying OCP violations in Lama. In Proceedings of the Western Conference on Linguistics 4, ed. Hunt, K. et al., 298–307. California State University, Fresno.Google Scholar
Ulrich, Charles H. 1994a. Diphthongization in the Refal dialect of Lama. In Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Special Session on Historical Issues in African Linguistics, ed. Moore, Kevin E., Peterson, David A., and Wentum, Comfort, 139–149. Berkeley Linguistics Society, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Ulrich, Charles H. 1994b. Diphthongization of short vowels in Lama and elsewhere. In Proceedings of the 1994 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, ed. Koskinen, Päivi, 571–582. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Ulrich, Charles H. 1995. Labial dissimilation in two Lama dialects. In Proceedings of the 1995 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, ed. Koskinen, Päivi, 591–601. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Ulrich, Charles H. 1996. Minimality and preservation in Lama loanwords. In Proceedings of the 1996 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, ed. Pasquini, Ana, Rowsell, Lorna, and Smith, Laura Catharine, 429–440. Calgary Working Papers in Linguistics, University of Calgary.Google Scholar
Ulrich, Charles H. 1997. Tone in Lama loanwords. Ms., University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira. 1993. Cantonese loanword phonology and optimality theory. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 2:261–291.Google Scholar