We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Anscombre, Jean-Claude. 2002. Mais/pourtant dans la contre-argumentation directe: raisonnement, généricité, et lexique. Linx46:115–132.Google Scholar
Anscombre, Jean-Claude and Ducrot, Oswald. 1983. L’argumentation dans la langue.Bruxelles: Mardaga.Google Scholar
Culioli, Antoine. 1990. Pour une linguistique de renonciation.Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Culioli, Antoine1995. Cognition and representation in linguistic theory.Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillaume, Gustave. 1965. Temps et verbe: théorie des aspects, des modes et des temps.Paris: Honoré Champion. [1929]Google Scholar
Guillaume, Gustave. 1988. Leçons de linguistique 1947-1948. Série C. Volume 8. Québec: Les Presses de l’Université Laval.Google Scholar
Guillaume, Gustave. 1991. Leçons de linguistique 1943-1944. Série A. Volume 10. Québec: Les Presses de l’Université Laval.Google Scholar
Guimier, Claude. 2011. La locution prépositive quitte à en français moderne: origine et emplois. Modèles Linguistiques64:137–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Franck Robert. 1990. Modality and the English modals.London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sekali, Martine and Trévise, Anne. 2012. Mapping filters and parameters of meaning: Issues and tools for interface analyses of meaning construction. In Mapping parameters of meaning, ed. Martine, Sekali and Trévise, Anne, 1–13. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar