Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:11:02.654Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language Acquisition Studies and a Feasible Theory of Grammar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Susanne Carroll
Susanne Carroll*
Affiliation:
Modern Language Centre, O.I.S.E.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There are various ways to construe the relationship between linguistic research and studies in language development. They can range in principle from strict dependence (one domain being parasitic on the other) to complete independence. Thus, it is now commonplace to find some developmental psycholinguists turning to generative linguistics for models through which to interpret child language (Chomsky 1969; Roeper 1973, 1982; Goodluck and Solan 1978, inter alia). This is not simply a matter of descriptive convenience. Research in grammatical theory and developmental psycholinguistics has grown increasingly interconnected since Chomsky first argued (1965:27) that hypothesized grammatical models within linguistics should be justified on the basis of their relation to a theory of language which specifies the innate abilities that make language acquisition possible. Hence the claim that linguistic theory is responsible for the “logical problem of language acquisition” (Baker 1979; Hornstein and Lightfoot 1981), i.e., gross properties of learning (relative rapidity, relative ease, overall lack of variability, general success, all on the basis of restricted input).

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , December 1989 , pp. 399 - 418
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aronoff, Mark 1976 Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Baker, C. Lee 1979 Syntactic Theory and the Projection Problem. Linguistic Inquiry 10:533–581.Google Scholar
Bever, Thomas 1981 Normal Acquisition Processes Explain the Critical Period for Language Learning. Pp. 176–178 in Individual Differences: Universals in Language Learning Aptitude. Diller, Karl, ed. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Bever, Thomas 1988 The Relation Between Linguistic Structure and Associative Theories of Language-Learning: A Constructivist Critique of Some Connectionist Learning Models. Colloquium delivered in the Language and Mind Series, University of Toronto. February 29, 1988.Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, Robert, and Chaudron, Craig 1988 Review Essay: A Critique of Flynn’s Parameter-Setting Model of Second Language Acquisition. University of Hawaii Working Papers in ESL 7:67–107.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit, and Wexler, Kenneth 1987 The Maturation of Syntax. Pp. 123–172 in Parameter Setting. Roeper, Thomas and Williams, Edwin, eds. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Campbell, Robin 1988 On Innateness: nee rasa est, nec omnia tenet. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 9:3–12.Google Scholar
Carroll, Susanne 1989a Review of O’Grady, Principles of Grammar and Learning (1987). Canadian Journal of Linguistics 34:89–97.Google Scholar
Carroll, Susanne 1989b On the Principle of Contrast. Paper given at the annual meeting of the Canadian Linguistic Association, Université Laval, May 28, 1989.Google Scholar
Carroll, Susanne, and Roberge, Yves 1989 Negative Evidence Revisited. Paper given at the annual meeting of the Canadian Linguistic Association, Université Laval, May 28, 1989.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Carol 1969 The Acquisition of Syntax in Children from 5 to 10. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1965 Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1981 Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1981 Principles and Parameters in Syntactic Theory. Pp. 32–75 in Explanation in Linguistics: The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition. Hornstein, Norbert and Lightfoot, David, eds. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1986 Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origins and Use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Clark, Eve 1985 The Acquisition of Romance with Special Reference to French. Pp. 687–782 in The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol. 1. Slobin, Dan, ed. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Dumas, Guy, Swain, Merrill, and Selinker, Larry 1974 L’apprentissage du français langue seconde en classe d’immersion dans un milieu torontois. Pp. 83–90 in Bilingualism, Biculturalism and Education. Carey, Stephen, ed. Proceedings from the Conference at Collège Universitaire Saint-Jean. Edmonton: University of Alberta.Google Scholar
Felix, Sascha 1984 Maturational Aspects of Universal Grammar. Pp. 133–161 in Interlanguage. Davis, Alan, Criper, Clive and Howatt, Anthony, eds. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Felix, Sascha 1987 Cognition and Language Growth. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Felix, Sascha 1988 Universal Grammar in Language Acquisition. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics 33:367–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flynn, Suzanne 1987a A Parameter-Setting Model of L2 Acquisition. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flynn, Suzanne 1987b Second Language Acquisition of Pronoun Anaphora: Resetting the Parameter. Pp. 227–243 in Studies in the Acquisition of Anaphora. Lust, Barbara, ed. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodluck, Helen, and Solan, Larry, eds. 1978 Papers in the Structure and Development of Child Language. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 4.Google Scholar
Harley, Birgit 1979 French Gender ‘Rules’ in the Speech of English-Dominant, French-Dominant and Monolingual French-Speaking Children. Working Papers in Bilingualism 19:129–156.Google Scholar
Harley, Birgit 1984 How Good is Their French? Language and Society: The Immersion Phenomenon 12:55–60.Google Scholar
Harley, Birgit 1986 Age in Second Language Acquisition. Multilingual Matters. Series 22. Clevedon, England.Google Scholar
Harley, Birgit, Allen, Patrick, Cummins, Jim, and Swain, Merrill 1987 The Development of Bilingual Proficiency Final Report, Vols. I and II. Toronto: O.I.S.E. Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert, and Lightfoot, David 1981 Introduction. Pp. 9–13 in Explanation in Linguistics: The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition. Hornstein, Norbert and Lightfoot, David, eds. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hyams, Nina 1986 Language Acquisition and the Theory of Parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Ioup, Georgette, and Weinberger, Steven 1987 Introduction. Pp. xi–xiv in Issues in Second Language Research. Interlanguage Phonology: The Acquisition of a Second Language Sound System. Ioup, Georgette and Weinberger, Steven, eds. Cambridge, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Johnson, Janice 1982 The Development of Metaphor Comprehension: Its Mental-Demand Measurement and Its Process-Analytical Models. Ph.D. dissertation, York University.Google Scholar
Johnson, Janice 1987 The Developmental Growth of Metaphor Comprehension in Children’s First and Second Language. In The Development of Bilingual Proficiency: The Nature of Language Proficiency. Harley, Birgit et al., eds. Toronto: Modern Language Centre, O.I.S.E. Final report to SSHRC.Google Scholar
Johnson, Janice, and Pascual-Leone, Juan 1984 Level of Processing and Mental-Attentional Demand in Metaphor-Comprehension: Their Measurement and Developmental Validation. Research Report 149. Toronto: Dept. of Psychology, York University.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, Annette 1979 A Functional Approach to Child Language: A Study of Determiners and Reference. Studies in Linguistics Series 24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krashen, Stephen, Scarcella, Robin, and Long, Michael, eds. 1982 Child-Adult Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Lapkin, Sharon, and Swain, Merrill 1977 The Use of English and French Cloze Tests in a Bilingual Education Program Evaluation: Validity and Error Analysis. Language Learning 27:279–314.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard 1988 Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory. Colloquium delivered at the University of Toronto, March 31, 1988.Google Scholar
Macnamara, John 1982 Names for Things. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Barry 1978 The Monitor Model: Some Methodological Considerations. Language Learning 28:309–332.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Barry, Rossman, Tammi, and McLeod, Beverly 1983 Second Language Learning: An Information-Processing Perspective. Language Learning 33:135–159.Google Scholar
O’Grady, William 1987 Principles of Grammar and Learning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Peters, Ann 1983 The Units of Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Phinney, Marianne 1987 The PRO-Drop Parameter in Second Language Acquisition. Pp. 221–238 in Parameter-Setting. Roeper, Thomas and Williams, Edwin, eds. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, Steven 1984 Language Learnability and Language Development. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Roeper, Thomas 1973 Theoretical Implications of Word Order, Topicalization and Inflections in German Language Acquisition. Pp. 541–584 in Studies of Child Language Development. Ferguson, Charles and Slobin, Dan, eds. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Roeper, Thomas 1982 The Role of Universals in the Acquisition of Gerunds. Pp. 267–287 in Language Acquisition: The State of the Art. Warner, Eric and Gleitman, Lila, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Singh, Rajendra 1988 Editor’s Introduction: In Defense of External Evidence. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics 33:329–343.Google Scholar
Sourdot, Marc 1977 Identification et differenciation des unités: les modalités nominales. Pp. 90–119 in La syntaxe de l’enfant avant 5 ans. François, Frédéric et al, eds. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
Swain, Merrill 1975 Writing Skills of Grade Three French Immersion Pupils. Working Papers in Bilingualism 7:1–38.Google Scholar
Tanenhaus, Michael 1988 Psycholinguistics: An Overview. Pp. 1–37 in Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey. Vol. III: Language: Psychological and Biological Aspects. Newmeyer, Frederick, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor-Browne, Karen 1984 The Acquisition of Grammatical Gender by Children in French Immersion Programmes. M.A. thesis, University of Calgary.Google Scholar
Wexler, Kenneth, and Culicover, Peter 1980 Formal Principles of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
White, Lydia 1981 The Responsibility of Grammatical Theory to Acquisitional Data. Pp. 241–283 in Explanation in Linguistics. Hornstein, Norbert and Lightfoot, David, eds. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
White, Lydia 1982 Grammatical Theory and Language Acquisition. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
White, Lydia 1985 The Acquisition of Parameterized Grammars: Subjacency in Second Language Acquisition. Second Language Research 1:1–17.Google Scholar