Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:58:16.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Philippe Hambye
Affiliation:
FNRS-Université catholique de Louvain
Anne Catherine Simon
Affiliation:
Université catholique de Louvain

Extract

The identification of varieties (dialects) — which requires relating linguistic features to major social categories such as class, age, gender, ethnicity and geographical origin — is one of the main achievements of variationist sociolinguistics. The task is central to the aims of sociolinguistics in two ways. First, it reveals the presence of structured heterogeneity within linguistic variation. Second, it accounts for the social meaning of linguistic variants: through the definition of bounded “social”, “regional” or “ethnic” varieties, so-called inter-speaker variation is directly associated with group membership and linguistic features become social identity markers.

Type
Introduction
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Eckert, Penelope. 2000. Linguistic variation as social practice: The linguistic construction of identity in Belten High. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heller, Monica. 2002. Éléments d’une sociolinguistique critique. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar
Lave, Jean, and Wenger, Etienne. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wenger, Etienne. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar