Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:25:23.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Indo-European Basic Colour Terms*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Kenneth Shields Jr.*
Affiliation:
Auburn University

Extract

Berlin and Kay (1969) present strong evidence that “all languages share a universal system of basic colour categorization” and that “the basic color-term inventories of most languages expand through time by lexicalizing these categories in a highly constrained, universal order” (Kay and McDaniel 1978:610). The validity of these conclusions has also been demonstrated by Collier et al. (1976) and by Kay and McDaniel (1978). The evolutionary process identified by Berlin and Kay can be represented schematically as follows:

where the arrow may be read ‘is encoded before’ (Kay and McDaniel 1978: 615). In other words, languages proceed through a series of stages in the development of their basic colour-term lexicon, with the most simplistic system containing only terms for white (light) and black (dark). Any expansion of this fundamental system will first result in the addition of a term for red and then in the addition of a term for green or yellow. If further expansion takes place, “yellow or green, whichever did not emerge at the previous stage, now emerges” (Berlin and Kay 1969:18), followed by terms for blue and brown. When a system develops beyond Stage VI, “there is a rapid expansion to the full roster of eleven basic color categories,” although no particular order of appearance among terms for purple, pink, orange, or gray has been ascertained (Berlin and Kay 1969:21-22).

Type
Remarks/Remarques
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Abbreviations are used for the following languages: Avestan = av.; Breton = Bret.; Cymric = Cymr., cymr.; Gallo-Latin = gallolat.; Gothic = Go.; Greek = Gk., gr.; Indo-European = IE; Latin = Lat., lat.; Lettish = Lett.; Lithuanian = Lith.; Old Church Slavic = OCS; Old English = ags.; Old High German = OHG; Old Icelandic = OIs., aisl.; Old Irish = OIr.; Old Prussian = OP; Russian = Russ.; Sanskrit = Skt., ai.; Vedic = Ved.

References

Berlin, Brent and Kay, Paul (1969) Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Buck, Carl D. (1949) A Dictionary of Selected Synonyms in the Principal Indo-European Languages. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Collier, G. A. et al. (1976) “Further evidence for universal color categories.” Language 52. 88490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, Paul and McDaniel, Chad (1978) “The linguistic significance of the meanings of basic color terms.” Language 54. 61046.Google Scholar
Pokorny, J. (1959) Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Bern: A. Francke.Google Scholar