Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:27:49.266Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Frederick J. Newmeyer. 2005. Possible and probable languages: A generative perspective on linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. x + 278. US $45.00 (softcover).

Review products

Frederick J. Newmeyer. 2005. Possible and probable languages: A generative perspective on linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. x + 278. US $45.00 (softcover).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Marco Nicolis*
Affiliation:
Queen’s University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews/Comptes rendus
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association/Association canadienne de linguistique 2008 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, Mark. 2001. The atoms of language. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Gary. 1987. A crosslinguistic approach to the pro-drop parameter. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 2004. Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders, and Roberts, Ian. 2005. On the role of parameters in universal grammar: A reply to Newmeyer. In Organizing grammar, ed. Broekhuis, H., Corver, N., Huybregts, R., Kleinhenz, U., and Koster, J., 538–553. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nicolis, Marco. To appear. The Null Subject Parameter and correlating properties: The case of Creole languages. In The limits of syntactic variation, ed. Biberauer, M.T.. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Topics in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 2004. On the study of the language faculty: Results, developments, and perspectives. The Linguistic Review 21:323–344.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 2007. Diachronic syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar