Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:04:53.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Frans Plank, ed. Ergativity: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations. New York: Academic Press. 1979. Pp. xiii + 569.*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Matthew S. Dryer
Matthew S. Dryer*
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews/Comptes-Rendus
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , Summer 1985 , pp. 207 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Stephen 1976 On the Notion of Subject in Ergative Languages. Pp. 3–23 in Subject and Topic. Li, Charles, ed. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra 1978 Case Marking and Grammatical Relations in Polynesian. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Cooreman, A., Fox, B. and Givón, T. 1980 The Discourse Definition of Ergativity. Studies in Language 8:1–34.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W. 1972 The Dyirbal Language of North Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W. 1979 Ergativity. Language 55:59–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David R. 1982 Grammatical Relations and Montague Grammar. Pp. 79–130 in The Nature of Syntactic Representation. Jacobson, P. and Pullum, G.K., eds. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy 1984 Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul and Thompson, Sandra 1980 Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse. Language 56:251–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, David 1977 Ergativity in Universal Grammar. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Johnson, Marion 1980 Ergativity in Inuktitut (Eskimo), in Montague Grammar, and in Relational Grammar. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward 1976 Toward a Universal Definition of Subject. Pp. 305–333 in Subject and Topic. Li, Charles, ed. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Li, Charles, ed. 1976 Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Marants, Alec P. 1984 On the Nature of Grammatical Relations. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 10. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael 1976 Hierarchy of Features and Ergativity. Pp. 112–171 in Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages. Dixon, R.M.W., ed. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar