Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:56:42.255Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

F.J. Newmeyer. Grammatical Theory: Its Limits and its Possibilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1983. Pp. xii + 193. $25.00 (cloth), $10.00 (paperback).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Peter Coopmans
Peter Coopmans*
Affiliation:
University of Utrecht
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews/Comptes-rendus
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , Fall 1984 , pp. 179 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, S. 1981 Why Phonology Isn’t Natural. Linguistic Inquiry 12:493–540.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. 1971 Inherent Variability and Variable Rules. Foundations of Language 7:457–92.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. 1982 Learning Without Experience the Creole Way. Pp. 15–29 in Exceptional Language and Linguistics. Obler, O. and Menn, L., eds. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. 1984 The Language Bioprogram Hypothesis. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7.2.Google Scholar
Caplan, D., ed. 1981 Biological Studies of Mental Processes. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1957 Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1980 Rules and Representations. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1981 Markedness and Core Grammar, in Theories of Markedness in Generative Grammar. Belletti, A., Brandi, L., and Rizzi, L., eds. Pisa: Scuole Normale Superiore.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1982 Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Governement and Binding. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 6. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1983 Class lectures, Fall semester, MIT.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. 1983 On the Validity of Typological Studies: A Reply to Smith. Australian Journal of Linguistics 3:93–96.Google Scholar
Coopmans, P. 1983 Review article of B. Comrie (1981) Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Journal of Linguistics 19:455–473.Google Scholar
Kaisse, E. 1983 The Syntax of Auxiliary Reduction in English. Language 59:93–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. and Chomsky, N. 1963 Finitary Models of Language Users. Pp. 419–492 in Handbook of Mathematical Psychology II. Luce, R., Bush, R. and Galanter, E., eds. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Smith, N.V. 1982 Review of B. Comrie (1981) Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Australian Journal of Linguistics 2:255–261.Google Scholar