Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T15:06:57.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Epenthesis in Old French

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Douglas C. Walker
Douglas C. Walker*
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper is structured in the following way: first, certain alternations involving consonantal insertion will be examined in order to motivate a synchronic epenthesis rule for Old French (OF) phonology. After details of this rule and some of its relationships with other rules are fixed, an interesting set of historical changes involving restructuring, analogy, and rule ordering will be investigated in an effort to clarify several complicated interactions between phonological and morphological factors in the evolution of the OF verb system.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 23 , Issue 1-2 , Spring/Fall 1978 , pp. 66 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, James M. 1965 A study of syncope in Vulgar Latin. Word 21.70–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunot, F. & Bruneau, C. 1949 Précis de grammaire historique de la langue française. Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
Chafe, w. 1968 The ordering of phonological rules. IJAL 34.115–36.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. 1968 The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Clayton, M. L. 1976 The redundance of underlying morpheme-structure conditions. Language 52.295–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fouché, P. 1966 Phonétique historique du français. Vol. III—Les consonnes et index général. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Fouché, P. 1967 Morphologie historique du français: le verbe. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Hale, W. & Buck, C. 1966 A Latin Grammar. Alabama: U. of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. 1975 Phonology: Theory and Analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R., Fant, G. & Halle, M. 1967 Preliminaries to Speech Analysis. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kaye, J. 1974 Contraintes profondes en phonologie: les emprunts. Cahier de linguistique 5.87–101.Google Scholar
King, R. 1973 Rule insertion. Language 49.551–78.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. 1968 Linguistic universals and linguistic change. In Universals in Linguistic Theory, ed. by Bach, E. and Harms, R.. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp. 171–202.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. 1971 Historical linguistics. In A Survey of Linguistic Science, ed. by Dingwall, W.. College Park, Md.: U. of Maryland Press, pp. 576–649.Google Scholar
Klausenburger, J. 1970 French Prosodies and Phonotactics: A Historical Typology. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Nyrop, K. 1935 Grammaire historique de la langue française. Tome I. Histoire générale de la langue française. Phonétique. Paris: Picard.Google Scholar
Pope, M. 1934 From Latin to Modern French with especial consideration of Anglo-Norman. Manchester: U. of Manchester Press.Google Scholar
Price, G. 1971 The French Language; Past and Present. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Pulgram, E. 1970 Syllable, Word, Nexus, Cursus. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Rheinfelder, E. 1967 Altfranzosische Grammatik. Zweiter Teil: Formenlehre. München: Heuber.Google Scholar
Schane, S. 1968 French Phonology and Morphology. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Shibatani, M. 1973 The role of surface phonetic constraints in generative phonology. Language 49.87–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerstein, A. 1974 On phonotactically motivated rules. Journal of Linguistics 10.71–94.Google Scholar
Walker, D. 1974 Contraintes profondes en phonologie française. Cahier de linguistique 5.77–86.Google Scholar