Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:06:46.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deriving Second Position

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Taylor Roberts
Taylor Roberts*
Affiliation:
York University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An examination of Pashto’s second-position pronominal clitics reveals that they are best regarded as agreement morphemes rather than as arguments of the verb. By base-generating these clitics as heads of agreement projections, their appearance in second position may be derived without recourse to phonological reordering rules, which have been necessary in earlier analyses.

Résumé

Résumé

Un examen des clitiques pronominaux de seconde position en pashto révèle qu’ils devraient être considérés comme des morphèmes d’accord, plutôt que comme des arguments du verbe. En générant ces clitiques comme têtes de projections d’accord, on peut dériver leur présence en seconde position sans avoir recours à des règles phonologiques, règles qui s’avéraient nécessaires dans les analyses antérieures.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 46 , Special Issue 1-2: The Syntax of Iranian Languages , June 2001 , pp. 127 - 153
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexiadou, Artemis, and Wilder, Chris, eds. 1998. Possessors, predicates, and movement in the determiner phrase, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Babrakzai, Farooq. 1999. Topics in Pashto syntax. Doctoral dissertation, University of Hawai’i at Manoa.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C. 1996. The polysynthesis parameter. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko, and Takahashi, Daiko. 1998. Scrambling and last resort. Linguistic Inquiry 29:347–366.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Readings in English transformational grammar, ed. Jacobs, Roderick A. and Rosenbaum, Peter S., 184–221. Waltham, Mass.: Ginn and Company.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Henry. 1995. The clitic-affix distinction in radical head-marking languages. In Proceedings of the 31st Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Parasession on Clitics, ed. Dainora, Andra et al., 64–78. Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Davis, Henry. 1996. On agreement in St’át’imcets(LillooetSalish). In Actes du Deuxième Colloque de Langues et Grammaires, ed. Nash, Lea, Tsoulas, Georges, and Zribi-Hertz, Anne, 79–94. Paris: Université de Paris VIII.Google Scholar
Davis, Henry. 1998. Subject inflection in Salish. Ms., University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Elfenbein, Josef. 1997. Pashto phonology. In Phonologies of Asia and Africa (including the Caucasus), vol. 2, ed. Kaye, Alan S., 733–760. Winona Lake, Ind.: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Franco, Jon. 2000. Agreement as a continuum: The case of Spanish pronominal clitics. In Clitic phenomena in European languages, ed. Beukema, Frits and Dikken, Marcel den, 147–189. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Franks, Steven L. 2000. Clitics at the interface. In Clitic phenomena in European languages, ed. Beukema, Frits and Dikken, Marcel den, 1–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gerlach, Birgit, and Grijzenhout, Janet. 2000. Clitics from different perspectives. In Clitics in phonology, morphology and syntax, ed. Gerlach, Birgit and Grijzenhout, Janet, 1–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Halpern, Aaron. 1995. On the placement and morphology of clitics. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15:531–574.Google Scholar
Jelinek, Eloise. 1984. Empty categories, case, and configurationality. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2:39–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaisse, Ellen M. 1981. Separating phonology from syntax: A reanalysis of Pashto cliticization. Journal of Linguistics 17:197–208.Google Scholar
Kaisse, Ellen M. 1985. Connected speech: The interaction of syntax and phonology. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 1989. Null subjects and clitic climbing. In The null subject parameter, ed. Jaeggli, Osvaldo and Safir, Kenneth J., 239–261. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Kitahara, Hisatsugu. 1995. Target α: Deducing strict cyclicity from derivational economy. Linguistic Inquiry 26:47–77.Google Scholar
Landau, Idan. 1999. Possessor raising and the structure of VP. Lingua 107:1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeuw, Frank van der. 1995. Alignment and integrity constraints in cliticization. In Proceedings of the 31st Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Parasession on Clitics, vol. 2, ed. Dainora, Andra et al, 168–180. Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Leeuw, Frank van der. 1997. Clitics: Prosodie studies. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, D.N. 1987. Pashto. In The world’s major languages, ed. Comrie, Bernard, 547–565. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, George A., and Chomsky, Noam. 1963. Finitary models of language users. In Handbook of mathematical psychology, vol. 2, ed. Luce, R. Duncan, Bush, Robert R., and Galanter, Eugene, 419–491. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 1997. Against optional scrambling. Linguistic Inquiry 28:1–25.Google Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2001. The EPP, scrambling and wA-in-situ. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. Kenstowicz, Michael, 293–338. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1986. Linguistic theory in America. 2nd ed. Diego, San: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Payne, Doris L., and Barshi, Immanuel, eds. 1999. External possession. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penzl, Herbert. 1955. A grammar of Pashto: A descriptive study of the dialect of Kandahar, Afghanistan. Washington, D.C.: American Council of Learned Societies.Google Scholar
Progovac, Ljiljana. 1993. Clitics in Serbian/Croatian: Comp as the second position. Ms., Wayne State University.Google Scholar
Progovac, Ljiljana. 1999. Clitic second and verb second. Ms., Wayne State University.Google Scholar
Roberts, Taylor. 1997. The optimal second position in Pashto. la Phonology in progress — Progress in phonology: HIL phonology papers III, ed. Booij, Geert and van de Weijer, Jeroen, 367–401. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
Roberts, Taylor. 2000. Clitics and agreement. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral dissertation, MIT. [Pp. references are to the edition published as Infinite syntax!, Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1986.]Google Scholar
Rudin, Catherine. 1997. AgrO and Bulgarian pronominal clitics. In Annual workshop on formal approaches to Slavic linguistics: The Indiana meeting, 1996, ed. Lindseth, Martina and Franks, Steven, 224–252. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
Schütze, Carson. 1994. Serbo-Croatian second position clitic placement and the phonology-syntax interface. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21:373–473.Google Scholar
Shafeev, D.A. 1964. A short grammatical outline of Pashto. Ed. and trans. Paper, Herbert H.. Bloomington: Indiana University and The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Skjærvø, Prods O, 1989. Pashto. In Compendium linguarum Iranicarum, ed. Schmitt, Rudiger, 384–410. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Sportiche, Dominique. 1996. Clitic constructions. In Phrase structure and the lexicon, ed. Rooryck, Johan and Zaring, Laurie, 213–276. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Stjepanovic, Sandra. 1998. On the placement of Serbo-Croatian clitics: Evidence from VP-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 29:527–537.Google Scholar
Suñer, Margarita. 1988. The role of agreement in clitic-doubled constructions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6:391–434.Google Scholar
Tegey, Habibullah. 1977. The grammar of clitics: Evidence from Pashto and other languages. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Tegey, Habibullah, and Robson, Barbara. 1996. A reference grammar of Pashto. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Tomic, Olga Mišeska. 1996. The Balkan Slavic clausal clitics. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14:811–872.Google Scholar