Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T14:03:47.003Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Carmen Dobrovie-Sorin et Claire Beyssade. Définir les indéfinis. Dans la collection Sciences du langage. Paris : CNRS Éditions. 2004. 227 pages. 25 € (broché).

Review products

Carmen Dobrovie-Sorin et Claire Beyssade. Définir les indéfinis. Dans la collection Sciences du langage. Paris : CNRS Éditions. 2004. 227 pages. 25 € (broché).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Éric Mathieu
Éric Mathieu*
Affiliation:
Université d’Ottawa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews/Comptes rendus
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , November 2007 , pp. 322 - 326
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association/Association canadienne de linguistique 2007 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Références

Baker, Mark C. 2003. Lexical categories : Verbs, nouns, and adjectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carlson, Greg. 1977. Reference to kinds in English. Thèse de doctorat. University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. Reference to kinds across languages. Natural language Semantics 6:339–405.Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra et Ladusaw, William. 2004. Restriction and saturation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dayal, Veneeta. 2003. A semantics for pseudo-incorporation. Ms., Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen. 1997. Types of predicates and the representation of existential readings. In SALT VII, sous la dir. Lawson, de Aaron, 117–134. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen et Laca, Brenda. 2003. Les noms sans déterminant dans les langues romanes. In Les langues romanes : Problèmes de la phrase simple, sous la dir. Godard, de Danielle, 235–281. Paris : Éditions du CNRS.Google Scholar
Farkas, Donka et de Swart, Henriette. 2003. The semantics of incorporation : From argument structure to discourse transparency. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Heyd, Sophie. 2003. L’interprétation des syntagmes nominaux en ‘des’ et ‘de’ en position sujet et objet : Généricité, habitualité et incorporation sémantique. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Strasbourg 2.Google Scholar
Johns, Alana. 2003. Restricting noun incorporation. Ms., University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Mathieu, Éric. 2002. The syntax of non-canonical quantification. Thèse de doctorat, University College, London.Google Scholar
Mathieu, Éric. 2004. The mapping of form and interpretation : The case of optional WH-movement in French. Lingua 114:1090–1132.Google Scholar
Milsark, Gary. 1977. Towards an explanation of certain peculiarities in the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis 3:1–30.Google Scholar
McNally, Louise. 1995. Bare plurals in Spanish are interpreted as properties. In Formal grammar, sous la dir. Morril, de Glyn et Oehrle, Richard, 197–222. Barcelona: Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya.Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara. 1987. Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In Studies in discourse representation theory and the theory of generalized quantifiers, sous la dir. Groenendijk, de Jeroen, de Jongh, Dick et Stokhof, Martin, 302–323. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
van Geenhoven, Veerle. 1998. Semantic incorporation and indefinite descriptions : Semantic and syntactic aspects of noun incorporation in WG. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar