Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:39:32.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Antonio Fábregas and Sergio Scalise. 2012. Morphology: From data to theories. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Pp. xii + 209. £19.90 (softcover).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2016

Francesco-Alessio Ursini*
Affiliation:
Stockholms Universitet

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews/Comptes Rendus
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association. 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Booij, Gert. 2010. Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Booij, Gert and Lieber, Rochelle. 2004. On the paradigmatic nature of affixal semantics in English and Dutch. Linguistics 42:327357.Google Scholar
DiSciullo, Anne Marie and Williams, Edwin. 1987. On the definition of word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hale, Ken and Keyser, Samuel J.. 2002. Prolegomenona to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbour, Daniel. 2007. Morphosemantic number. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 2012. Semantics in Distributed Morphology. In Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, ed. Maienborn, Claudia, von Heusinger, Klaus, and Portner, Paul, 688709. Amsterdam: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. Lexical phonology and morphology. Linguistics in the morning calm: Selected papers from SICOL-1981, ed. Yang, In-Shu, 391. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar