Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:08:03.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anti-ECP Effects in the Rejang Language of Sumatra

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Richard McGinn*
Affiliation:
Ohio University

Abstract

This article explores some evidence against the ECP that appears at first to be fairly overwhelming. Upon deeper inspection, however, the evidence supports the ECP and a special universal computation involving the complementizer system, the Complementizer Contraction rule (Pesetsky 1982). Complementizer Contraction is parameterized; some languages have an overt reflex (French, Norwegian); other languages do not (English, Tagalog). To make the argument, many intricate details are described about the structure of relative clauses, comparative clauses, embedded complement clauses, and wh-questions in Rejang, a Western Austronesian language of Sumatra.

Résumé

Résumé

Cet article examine des faits qui paraissent remettre en cause le Principe des catégories vides. Un examen plus attentif de ces faits montre qu’en définitive ceux-ci sont conformes au Principe des catégories vides en autant que ce principe soit assorti d’une computation spéciale universelle ayant trait au système du complémenteur, la règle de la Contraction du complémenteur (Pesetsky 1982). La Contraction du complémenteur fait l’objet d’une paramétrisation: certaines langues appliquent cette règle de façon visible (français, norvégien) alors que dans d’autres langues elle s’applique de façon non visible (anglais, tagalog). Afin de présenter cette argumentation, des aspects détaillés de la structure des phrases relatives, des comparatives, des subordonnées et des questions-wh de la langue rejang, une langue austronésienne de l’ouest parlée à Sumatra, sont examinés.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1986a. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1986b. Barriers. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Guilfoyle, Eithne, Hung, Henrietta, and Travis, Lisa. 1992. Spec of IP and Spec of VP: Two subjects in Austronesian languages. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10:375414.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward, and Comrie, Bernard. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8:6399.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard, and Saito, Mamoru. 1984. On the nature of proper government. Linguistic Inquiry 15:235289.Google Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1994. Reference and proper names. Linguistic Inquiry 25:609666.Google Scholar
McCloskey, James. 1990. Resumptive pronouns, A-bar binding, and levels of representation in Irish. In Syntax and semantics 23: The syntax of the modem Celtic languages, ed. Hendrick, Randall, 199248. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
McGinn, Richard. 1982. Outline of Rejang syntax. Jakarta: NUSA.Google Scholar
McGinn, Richard. 1989. The animacy hierarchy and Western Austronesian languages. In ESCOL ‘89, ed. Jong, Ken de and No, Yongkyun, 207217. Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1982. Complementizer-trace phenomena and the Nominative Island Condition. The Linguistic Review 1:297343.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar