Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:09:47.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Donald Songer, Susan Johnson, C. L. Ostberg and Matthew Wetstein Law, Ideology, and Collegiality. Judicial Behaviour in the Supreme Court of Canada. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2012. 223 pp.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2013

Laura Bisaillon
Laura Bisaillon*
Affiliation:
Assistant ProfessorHealth StudiesUniversity of Toronto Scarborough
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews / Compte rendus
Information
Canadian Journal of Law and Society / La Revue Canadienne Droit et Société , Volume 29 , Issue 2: Law and Decolonization / Droit et décolonisation , August 2014 , pp. 291 - 292
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Law and Society Association / Association Canadienne Droit et Société 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 At a November 2012 panel on the subject of HIV non-disclosure and criminal law in Canada held at McGill University’s Faculty of Law, four panelists explored the contours and consequences of two recent Supreme Court decisions (R v Mabior, 2012 SCC 47 and R v DC, 2012 SCC 48). During the question-and-answer period, an attendee expressed surprise that Canadian justices’ decisions in these appeals were unanimous. Interestingly, the historical record shows that justices’ decisions are, by and large, unanimous.