Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T12:57:28.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“The Other Woman: Lizzie Cyr and the Origins of the ‘Persons Case’”*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2014

David Bright
David Bright
Affiliation:
Department of History, The University of Calgary
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 1929, the British Privy Council reversed an earlier ruling by Canada's Supreme Court that Canadian women did not, under the British North America Act, qualify as persons. Historians have long heralded this so-called ‘Persons Case’ as a turning point in the recognition of Canadian women's rights. However, little attention has been paid to the case's origins, which date back to the trial of an alleged prostitute in Calgary in 1917. That case successfully tested the right of women to hold high public office in Alberta – in this case, Calgary Police Magistrate Alice Jamieson – and began the subsequent twelve-year battle. However, this victory was achieved only at the expense of the rights of another woman: the alleged prostitute Lizzie Cyr. At best, then, the ‘Persons Case’ should be regarded as a tainted victory.

Résumé

En 1929, le Conseil privé de Grande-Bretagne renversait un arrêt de la Cour suprême du Canada à l'effet qu'en vertu du British North America Act les Canadiennes ne pouvaient être considérées comme des personnes. Les historiens ont souvent qualifié cette «Affaire des personnes» de point tournant dans la reconnaissance des droits des femmes au Canada. Cependant, on a porté peu d'attention aux origines de cette affaire, qui remonte au procès d'une présumée prostituée de Calgary en 1917. Cette cause allait être le point de départ d'une bataille juridique de douze ans pour faire reconnaître le droit des femmes à occuper un poste dans la haute fonction publique albertaine, en l'occurrence celui de magistrat de police d'Alice Jamieson. Cependant, cette victoire fut acquise seulement aux dépens des droits d'une autre femme, la présumée prostituée Lizzie Cyr. Il faudrait donc, au mieux, considérer l'«Affaire des personnes» comme une victoire mitigée.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Law and Society / La Revue Canadienne Droit et Société , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , Fall/automne 1998 , pp. 99 - 115
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Law and Society Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Quoted in (1928–1929) Canadian Annual Review at 66. See also Franca Iocavetta, “‘A Respectable Feminist’: The Political Career of Wilson, Senator Cairine, 1921–1962” in Kealey, Linda & Sangster, Joan, eds., Beyond the Vote: Canadian Women and Politics (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1989) 63.Google Scholar

2. Barnett, Vicki, “Recognition Sought for Heroes of ‘Persons’ Case” Calgary Herald (9 October 1996) B4.Google Scholar See also Cameron, Leah, “What Could Be Done” in Calgary Skylines (April 1998) 18Google Scholar; Women's, Alberta Secretariat, The Persons Case (Edmonton: 1989).Google Scholar

3. Prentice, Alison et al. , Canadian Women: A History, 2d ed (Toronto: Harcourt Brace, 1996) at 323.Google Scholar This interpretation can be found in other standard texts. For example, see Finkel, Alvin & Conrad, Margaret, History of the Canadian People: 1867 to the Present, 2d ed. (Toronto: Copp Clark, 1998) at 234Google Scholar; Francis, R. Douglas, Jones, Richard & Smith, Donald B., Destinies: Canadian History Since Confederation, 3d ed. (Toronto: Harcourt Brace Canada, 1996) at 245–46.Google Scholar For a popular treatment of the event, see Mander, Christine, Emily Murphy: Rebel (Toronto: Simon & Pierre, 1985) at 110–27.Google Scholar Typical in its uncritical approach is Kilgour's, David brief appraisal of Murphy's life in his Uneasy Patriots: Western Canadians in Confederation (Edmonton: Lone Pine, 1988) at 79–90.Google Scholar

4. For example, see Joffre, Hal, “Flawed Record Follows Revered Famous Five” Calgary Herald (21 February 1998) J6Google Scholar; Menzies, Peter, “It's Wrong to Excuse Murphy's Beliefs about Race” Calgary Herald (6 May 1998) A14Google Scholar; Simons, Paula, “Heroine in a Black Hat” Edmonton Journal (7 June 1998).Google Scholar On Murphy, see also McLaren, Angus, Our Own Master Race: Eugenics in Canada, 1885–1945 (Toronto: McClelland & Stewart, 1990) at 100–01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5. “Calgary Has First Woman Magistrate in the World in Mrs. Alice Jamieson” Calgary Herald (13 March 1920) 16.

6. Stone, Olive M., “Canadian Women as Legal Persons: How Alberta Combined Judicial, Executive and Legislative Powers to Win Full Legal Personality for All Canadian Women” (1979) 17 Alta L. Rev. 331 at 332.Google Scholar

7. Bliss, Michael, “Privatizing the Mind: The Sundering of Canadian History, the Sundering of Canada” (1991–1992) 26 Journal of Canadian Studies 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Granatstein, J. L., Who Killed Canadian History? (Toronto: Harper Collins, 1998).Google Scholar Various responses to Bliss's views can be found in (1992) 27 Journal of Canadian Studies 123.

8. On this subject, see Strange, Carolyn, Toronto's Girl Problem: The Perils and Pleasure of the City, 1880–1930 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1995), at 53–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Walkowitz, Judith R., Prostitution and Victorian Society: Women, Class, and the State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Walkowitz, Judith R., City of Dreadful Delight: Narratives of Sexual Danger in Late-Victorian London (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Fingard, Judith, The Dark Side of Life in Victorian Halifax (Nova Scotia: Pottersfield, 1989)Google Scholar; Valverde, Mariana, The Age of Light, Soap, and Water: Moral Reform in English Canada, 1885–1925 (Toronto: McClelland & Stewart, 1991)Google Scholar; Strange, Carolyn & Loo, Tina, Making Good: Law and Moral Reform in Canada, 1867–1939 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1997).Google Scholar Much of what follows relies heavily on the work of John MacLaren. See especially “The Canadian Magistracy and the Anti-White Slavery Campaign, 1900–1920” in Pue, W. Wesley & Wight, Barry, eds., Canadian Perspectives on Law & Society: Issues in Legal History (Ottawa: Carleton University Press, 1988) 329CrossRefGoogle Scholar; “Chasing the Social Evil: Moral Fervour and the Evolution of Canada's Prostitution Laws, 1867–1917” (1986) 1 C.J.L.S. 125; McLaren, John & Lowman, John, “Enforcing Canada's Prostitution Laws, 1892–1920: Rhetoric and Practice” in Friedland, M. L., ed., Securing Compliance: Seven Case Studies (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1990) 21.Google Scholar

9. MacLaren & Lowman, ibid. at 26.

10. Larsen, E. Nick, “Canadian Prostitution Control Between 1914 and 1970: An Exercise in Chauvinist Reasoning” (1992) 2 C.J.L.S. 137 at 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11. MacLaren & Lowman, supra note 8 at 26.

12. On this question, see Backhouse, Constance, “Nineteenth-Century Canadian Prostitution Law: Reflection of a Discriminatory Society” (1985) 18 Social History 387.Google Scholar

13. See Kealey, Gregory S., Toronto Workers Respond to Industrial Capitalism, 1867–1892 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1980)Google Scholar; Palmer, Bryan, Working-Class Experience: Rethinking the History of Canadian Labour, 1800–1991, 2d ed. (Toronto: McClelland & Stewart, 1992) at 81–154Google Scholar; Heron, Craig, “The Second Industrial Revolution in Canada, 1890–1930” in Hopkins, Deian R. & Kealey, Gregory S., eds., Class, Community and the Labour Movement: Wales and Canada, 1850–1930 (Wales: Llafur/CCLH, 1989) 48.Google Scholar

14. MacLaren & Lowman, supra note 8 at 28–75.

15. Ibid. at 27.

16. See Parker, Graham, “The Legal Regulation of Sexual Activity and the Protection of Females” (1983) 21 Osgoode Hall L. J. 187.Google Scholar See also Honourable Mr.Wood, Justice Josiah & Peck, Richard C. C., Q.C., eds., 100 Years of the Criminal Code in Canada (Ottawa: Canadian Bar Association, 1993).Google Scholar

17. For a discussion of this notion, see Monkkonen, Eric H., The Dangerous Class: Crime and Poverty in Columbus, Ohio, 1860–1885 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18. Cassel, Jay, The Secret Plague: Venereal Disease in Canada, 1838–1939 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1987) at 122–75Google Scholar; Buckley, Suzann & McGinnis, Janice Dickin, “Venereal Disease and Public Health Reform in Canada” (1982) 63 Canadian Historical Review 337 at 348–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar See also MacLaren & Lowman, supra note 8 at 57–62.

19. Buckley & Dickin McGinnis, ibid. at 349–50.

20. MacLaren, “The Canadian Magistracy,” supra note 8 at 344–45.

21. Strong-Boag, Veronica, The New Day Recalled: Lives of Girls and Women in English Canada, 1919–1939 (Markham, Ont.: Penguin, 1988) at 202.Google Scholar

22. Supra note 5 at 16.

23. Ibid.

24. For biographical details of Jamieson, see Glenbow Museum Archives (GMA), clipping file for Alice Jamieson.

25. Supra note 5 at 16. See also Murphy, Emily F., “The Woman's Court” (January 1920) 33 MacLean's Magazine 27 at 27–28, 73–75.Google Scholar

26. MacLaren & Lowman, supra note 8 at 36–37. See also Bacchi, Carol Lee, Liberation Deferred? The Ideas of English-Canadian Suffragists, 1877–1918 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1983) at 30–40, 112–14Google Scholar; Janice Newton, “From Wage Slave to White Slave: The Prostitution Controversy and the Early Canadian Left” in Kealey and Sangster, supra note 1, 217.

27. MacLaren, “The Canadian Magistracy,” supra note 8 at 345.

28. See Thorner, Tom & Watson, Neil, “Patterns of Prairie Crime: Calgary, 1875–1939” in Knafla, Louis A., ed., Crime and Criminal Justice in Europe and Canada (Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1981) 219Google Scholar; Bright, David, ‘‘Loafers Are Not Going to Subsist Upon Public Credulence’: Vagancy and the Law in Calgary, 1900–1914” (1995) 36 Labour 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

29. Palmer, Howard & Palmer, Tamara, Alberta: A New History (Edmonton: Hurtig, 1991) at 236.Google Scholar

30. MacLean, Una, “The Famous Five” (1962) 10 Alberta Historical Review 1Google Scholar; Marchildon, Rudy G., “The ‘Persons’ Controversy: The Legal Aspects of the Fight for Women Senators” (1981) 6 Atlantis 99Google Scholar; Reineberg, Faye Holt, “Women's Suffrage in Alberta” (1991) 39 Alberta History 25.Google Scholar

31. The main sources are (1917) 3 W.W.R. 849–60, 1185–88; (1918–1919) 12 Alta L. R. 320–38; GMA, M6840, J. McKinley Cameron papers, file 98, King v. Lizzie Waters.

32. Ryan's account of events is contained in King vs Waters, ibid. at 3–12.

33. Ibid.

34. Weaver, John, Crimes, Constables, and Courts: Order and Transgression in a Canadian City, 1816–1970 (Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1995) at 71.Google Scholar

35. King v. Waters, supra note 31at 12–13. It is difficult to assess whether Jamieson's refusal of a defence was a commonplace action. However, Weaver provides a revealing picture of local court practices in Crimes, Constables, and Courts, ibid. at 64–107.

36. Valverde, supra note 8 at 78. See also Bright, supra note 28 at 48–50.

37. In addition to works by Backhouse and Larsen cited above, see also Parker, supra note 16.

38. Backhouse, supra note 12 at 390–423.

39. King vs Waters, supra note 31 at 10.

40. Ibid. at 10–11.

41. Ibid. at 5–8.

42. See Watson, Neil B., “Counsel for the Defense: John McKinley Cameron K.C.” in Foran, Max & Jameson, Sheilagh, eds., Citymakers: Calgarians after the Frontier (Calgary: Historical Society of Alberta, Chinook Country Chapter, 1987) 117, at 124.Google Scholar The Cameron papers contain more than 900 case files that provide details of his career as a defence lawyer.

43. MacLaren & Lowman, supra note 8 at 84 n 124; Gray, James H., Talk to My Lawyer! Great Stories of Southern Alberta's Bar & Bench (Edmonton: Hurtig, 1987) at 59–79.Google Scholar

44. (1917–18) 12 Alta L.R. at 321–22; (1917) 2 W.W.R. at 1185–86.

45. Ibid. at 322–23; W.W.R. ibid. at 1186.

46. Alta L.R., ibid. at 323–24; W.W.R., ibid. at 1186–88.

47. Alta L.R., ibid. at 324–25; W.W.R., ibid. at 1188.

48. Alta L.R., ibid. at 326; (1917) 3 W.W.R., supra note 31 at 850.

49. Alta L.R., ibid. at 336; W.W.R., ibid. at 858–59.

50. Alta L.R., ibid. at 336; W.W.R., ibid. at 859.

51. Ibid.

52. Alta L.R., ibid. at 337–38; W.W.R., ibid. at 860.