Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:53:03.373Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Male Domestic Abuse: The Continuing Contrast Between Women's Experiences and Juridical Responses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2014

Rosanna Langer
Rosanna Langer
Affiliation:
Department of Women's and Gender Studies, University of Saskatchewan School of Human Justice, University of Regina
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Women's perceptions of abuse differ deeply from official characterizations of them and are largely absent from legal discourse on male domestic abuse despite two decades of reform initiatives. This article traces the enforcement of male domestic dominance and violence through the failures of the criminal justice system to incorporate women's perspectives in systemic responses to male spouse batterers. I argue that it is factors such as official labelling of abuse by the juridical system, including police, which determine whether abuse is ‘officially’ recognized as such and whether the male violent family is stabilized by policies, practices, and non-intervention. This interaction between definitions and institutional responses makes it crucial to understand how women define their own experiences of abuse. The article concludes that male domestic abuse remains a contested area of juridical understandings and practices. Insofar as the ‘official’ definition of her situation impacts on the abused woman's self-perception, and on her access to resources she might use to get out of danger, it determines the organization of ‘domestic abuse’ as well.

Résumé

La perception qu'ont les femmes de la violence conjugale diffère largement du “portrait officiel” de la victime et leur point de vue est pratiquement ignoré dans le débat juridique sur la violence conjugale en dépit des efforts de réforme des 20 dernières années. L'auteure de cet article fait état du maintien, au sein du couple et de la famille, de la domination et de la violence masculines et ce en raison du défaut du système judiciaire criminel d'intégrer la perspective des femmes dans la réponse «systémique» à la violence conjugale. L'auteure soutient que ce sont des facteurs tels que la définition officielle de la violence conjugale, établie par la machine judiciaire—dont fait partie le «corps policier»—qui déterminent s'il y a effectivement violence conjugale et si la famille est maintenue dans cette violence par les politiques, les pratiques et l'absence d'intervention. La compréhension de l'interaction entre les définitions et les réponses institutionnelles est importante afin de saisir comment les femmes définissent leur propre expérience de la violence conjugale. Dans cet article, l'auteure conclut que la violence conjugale demeure un terrain de débat des conceptions et des pratiques juridiques. Dans la mesure où la définition officielle de sa situation influence l'image qu'a d'ellemême la victime et le choix des diverses ressources auxquelles elle recourt pour se mettre hors de danger, cette définition détermine de la même manière la façon dont est gérée la violence conjugale.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Law and Society / La Revue Canadienne Droit et Société , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , Spring/printemps 1995 , pp. 65 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Law and Society Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Parnas, Raymond, “Prosecutorial and Judicial Handling of Family Violence” (1971) 9 Criminal Law Bulletin 734Google Scholar.

2. Stark, Evan, Flitcraft, Anne & Frazier, William, “Medicine and Patriarchal Violence: The Social Construction of a ‘Private Event’” (1979) 9 International Journal of Health Services 462CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3. Several months after leaving a relationship of fifteen years, a personal friend of the author speaks of her experience. Transcript of the conversation (September 1991) on file with the author.

4. Walker, Lenore, The Battered Woman (New York: Harper & Row, 1979) at 16Google Scholar.

5. McLeod, Linda, Battered But Not Beaten: Preventing Wife Battering in Canada (Ottawa: Canadian Advisory Council on Status of Women, 1987) at 6–7Google Scholar,. The author roughly extrapolates this figure from statistics available in 1985 from shelters for battered women, including numbers of women turned away because of lack of space, plus an estimate of those who seek non-residential services.

6. I am indebted to the external reviewer who urged me to clarify and extend my claims about the juridical construction of the crime of “male domestic violence.” I thank my colleague Walter DeKeseredy for the use of the term “woman abuse”. See DeKeseredy, Walter, Woman Abuse in Dating Relationships: The Role of Male Peer Support (Toronto: Canadian Scholars' Press, 1995)Google Scholar.

7. See Bunting, Annie, “Theorizing Women's Cultural Diversity in Feminist International Human Rights Strategies” (1993) 20 Journal of Law and Society 15CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8. Turpel, Mary Ellen, “Patriarchy and Paternalism: The Legacy of the Canadian State for First Nations Women” (1993) 6 C.J.W.L. 183Google Scholar.

9. Kelly, Liz, “How Women Define Their Experiences of Violence” in Yllo, Kersti & Bograd, Michele, eds., Feminist Perspectives on Wife Abuse (Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1988) 114 at 117Google Scholar.

10. MacLeod, supra note 5 at 16 [emphasis in original].

11. Mahoney, Martha, “Legal Images of Battered Women: Redefining the Issue of Separation” (1991) 90 Michigan Law Review 20CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12. Tolman, Richard and Bhosley, Gauri, “The Outcome of Participation in a Shelter-Sponsored Program for Men who Batter” in Knudsen, Dean & Miller, JoAnn, eds., Abused and Battered: Social and Legal Responses to Family Violence (New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1991) 113Google Scholar.

13. Kelly, supra note 9 at 115.

14. Nor should they. A constant tension in this article is to keep women and women's experiences of being women in our society in view. One of the ways to ensure this is to avoid viewing women reductively. This is one of the reasons why I am adverse to using the phrase “battered women.” See Schneider, Elizabeth, “Particularity and Generality” (1992) 67 New York University Law Review 530Google Scholar. She notes that women resist applying the term “battered woman” to themselves even when seeking services. See also Schechter, Susan, Women and Male Violence: The Visions and Struggles of the Battered Women's Movement (Boston: South End Press, 1982) at 252Google Scholar, “Victim is … a label that many shelter residents reject. They do not like viewing themselves solely as battered women. They feel that these words fail to capture their complexity and strength.” Almost every feminist work on male domestic abuse grapples with this issue of naming the violence in a way that doesn't make it seem as though it is women's “problem.”

15. Gilligan, Carol, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1982) at 28Google Scholar.

16. Canadian Council on Social Development and Native Women's Association of Canada, Voices of Aboriginal Women: Aboriginal Women Speak Out About Violence (Ottawa: Canadian Council on Social Development, 1991) [hereinafter Voices of Aboriginal Women] at 4Google Scholar.

17. Kelly, supra note 9 at 119.

18. Ibid. at 121.

19. Campbell, Jacquelyn, “Women's Responses to Sexual Abuse in Intimate Relationships” (1989) 10 Health Care for Women International 335 at 343CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed. See also Finkelhor, David & Yllo, Kersti, License to Rape (New York: Free Press, 1985)Google Scholar; Frieze, Irene, “Investigating the Causes and Consequences of Marital Rape” (1983) 8 Signs 532CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Russell, Diane, Rape in Marriage (New York: MacMillan, 1982)Google Scholar.

20. Finkelhor, David & Yllo, Kersti, “Rape in Marriage: A Sociological View” in Finkelhor, David et al. , The Dark Side of Families: Current Family Violence Research (Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1983) 119 at 126Google Scholar.

21. As the reform of criminal law moves towards a gender-neutral model of sexual assault, married women have become the equals of other women, and sexual assaults have become much like other assaults, with the added proviso that sexual assaults occur in sexual circumstances or violate the victim's sexual integrity. Whether this appropriately captures the invasive harm experienced by women who are “raped,” particularly by their partners, is questionable, but it is not a question that will be taken up here. Section 278 of the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C–46Google Scholar reads: “A husband or wife may be charged with an offence under ss. 271, 272, or 273 [sexual assaults] in respect of his or her spouse, whether or not the spouses were living together at the time …”

22. Bruno v. Codd 90 Misc 2d 1047, 396 N.Y.S. 2d 974 (Sup.Ct. 1977) as discussed in Woods, Laurie, “Litigation on Behalf of Battered Women” (1978) 5 Women's Rights Law Review 7Google Scholar.

23. Zorza, Joan, “The Criminal Law of Misdemeanor Domestic Violence, 1970–1990” (1992) 83 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 57CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24. Voices of Aboriginal Women, supra note 16 at 4.

25. Papp, Aruna Isaac, “Sujata's Death” in Mukherjee, Arun, ed., Sharing Our Experience (Ottawa: Canadian Advisory Council on Status of Women, 1993) at 148–49Google Scholar.

26. Jacquelyn Campbell, “Public Health Conceptions of Family Abuse” in Knudsen & Miller, eds., supra note 12 at 35.

27. Irene Frieze, 1979; Jean Giles-Sims, 1983; Dale Miller & Carol Porter, 1983 as cited in Campbell, ibid. at 42–43.

28. Kelly, supra note 9 at 124.

29. Ibid. at 127.

30. McGillivray, Anne, “Battered Women: Definition, Models and Prosecutorial Policy” (1987) 6 Can. J. Fam. L. 23Google Scholar.

31. Jacquelyn Campbell, ”Public Health Conceptions of Family Abuse”, supra note 26 at 41.

32. See Ibn-Tamas v. U.S., 407 A.2d 626 (DC App. Ct. 1979).

33. Smith v. State, 277 S.E.2d at 680 as discussed in Littleton, Christine, “Women's Experience and the Problem of Transition: Perspectives on Male Battering of Women” (1989) University of Chicago Legal Forum 23Google Scholar.

34. Zorza, supra note 23 at 50.

35. Mahoney, supra note 11. See also Smith, M., The Incidence and Prevalence of Woman Abuse in Toronto (Toronto: LaMarsh Research Programme on Violence and Conflict Resolution, York University, 1987)Google ScholarPubMed.

36. Ewing, Charles Patrick, Battered Women Who Kill: Psychological Self-Defence as Legal Justification (Lexington: D.C. Heath, 1987) at 13Google Scholar.

37. R. v. Fern Wayne Kreton, (6 February 1990 (Man. Prov. Ct.) [unreported] as cited in Brown, Mona et al. , eds., Gender Equality in the Courts, Criminal Law (Winnipeg: Manitoba Association of Women and the Law, 1991) 3:16Google Scholar.

38. Ibid. at 3-16.

39. “Husband Given Life Term in Ottawa Crossbow Murder” The Globe and Mail [national edition] (13 March 1993) A6Google Scholar. See also McGregor v. The Queen (1992), 12 C.R.R. (2d) 155 (Ont. Ct. Gen. Div.) where the accused applied for trial by judge alone because of the enormous publicity surrounding the killing of his estranged wife.

40. Campbell, “Women's Responses to Sexual Abuse in Intimate Relationships”, supra note 19 at 337.

41. Prairie Research Associates, Literature Review of the Manitoba Spouse Abuse Project (Prairie Research Associates, 1990) [unpublished] at 10–11Google Scholar.

42. McGillivray, supra note 30 at 29–30. As Saskatchewan is my home province, I will look at institutional legal responses there most closely. Although justice initiatives in each province are similar, regional circumstances such as rural/urban demographics and the role of the RCMP as compared to municipal police forces must be factored into any policy assessment.

43. Policy, Planning and Evaluation Branch, Saskatchewan Deptartment of Justice, Report on Police and Prosecutorial Involvement in Cases of Wife Abuse in Saskatchewan (Regina: Saskatchewan Justice, 1987) [hereinafter Saskatchewan Justice Report]Google Scholar

44. Ibid. at 33.

45. Ibid. at 31.

46. Ibid. at 56, table 4.12.

47. Once again, I wish to thank the external reviewer who encouraged me to develop the assertion that the juridical construction of the charge or accusation is implicated in the discrepancy between women's experiences and the official determinations of abuse.

48. Buzawa, Eve & Buzawa, Carl, Domestic Violence: The Criminal Justice Response (Newbury Park, California: Sage, 1990) at 56 [hereinafater Domestic violence]Google Scholar.

49. Mahon, Peggy, Silence in the Court: Battered Women's Experience in the Legal System in North East Nova Scotia 1984-1988 at 21 [hereinafter Tearmann Report]Google Scholar. The report was sponsored by the Tearmann Society for Battered Women which operates the Tearmann House shelter in New Glasgow, Nova Scotia, based on concerns by staff and volunteers that women were not getting fair or appropriate treament in the criminal justice responses to male domestic abuse.

50. In Literature Review of the Manitoba Spouse Abuse Project, supra note 41 at 16, the authors note that despite reforms, police continue to treat domestic abuse cases with low priority: “Frequently, they [police] do not respond at all, they seldom make arrests or use other criminal sanctions or remedies even when there is probable cause to do so, and they mismanage investigations of family violence, subsequently jeopardizing prosecution efforts.”

51. Saskatchewan Justice Report, supra note 43 at 42.

52. Case synopses in ibid. at 42–45.

53. Ibid. at 99.

54. Tearmann Report, supra note 49 at 58.

55. Voices of Aboriginal Women, supra note 16 at 16.

56. Saskatchewan Justice Report, supra note 43 at 65.

57. Ibid. at 66.

58. Tearmann Report, supra note 49.

59. Ibid. at 22, 23, 29.

60. Responses to Peace Bond questionnaire from various provincial transition house staff, file material, Provincial Association of Transition Houses Saskatchewan, December 1990–January 1991, Saskatoon, Sask.

61. Victims of Domestic Violence Act, S.S. 1994, c. V–6.02Google Scholar.

62. Ibid. at s. 3(3).

63. Ibid. at s. 8. Those who can make an application include designated mobile crisis unit staff, co-ordinators of victim assistance programmes, and police officers. Victims of Domestic Violence Act, ibid., s. 3.

64. Telephone conversation with Janice Gingell, Provincial Association of Transition Houses Saskatchewan (PATHS) (6 March 1995) Saskatoon, Sask.

65. Tearmann Report, supra note 49 at 87.

66. Quotations by police force members from the Saskatchewan Justice Report, supra note 43 at 65-66, include: “They are sometimes respectable people who have a problem … a well-off white couple and things get out of hand and if you charge the husband the police look bad.” “Everyone complains about assault because they want their husband out and the next day they don't have a complaint. Also in 90% of recent cases she hits him first and then they fight.”

67. Ibid. at 70.

68. See Frisch, Lisa, “Research that Succeeds, Policies that Fail” (1992) 83 Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 215CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

69. Tearmann Report, supra note 49 at 85.

70. Atkinson, Wendy, The Criminal Justice System and Spousal Assault: Observations Based on a Court Watch Study (Saskatoon: Provincial Association of Transition Houses Saskatchewan, July 1992) [unpublished]Google Scholar.

71. Confidential correspondence from the Saskatchewan Department of Justice, (March 1991) [file material PATHS, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan].

72. Saskatchewan Justice Report, supra note 43 at 167–73.

73. Quoting from a Judicial Council of Manitoba decision inquiring into the conduct of Judge Kenneth B. Peters, 14 November 14, 1989 in Brown et al., eds., supra note 37 at 3:31.

74. Saskatchewan Justice Report, supra note 43 at 123.

75. Atkinson, supra note 69 at 2.

76. Mahon, supra note 49 at 131.

77. Saskatchewan Justice Report, supra note 43 at 131.

78. Ibid. at 132.

79. Ibid. at 140, case 300.

80. Ibid. at 134, table 9.2.

81. Ibid. at 141.

82. Buzawa and Buzawa observe, for example, in Domestic Violence, supra note 48 at 115, that the availability of emergency protection orders and their use or disuse by a victim herself is one way for women to assert control over their own situation.

83. Tearmann Report, supra note 49 at 12.

84. Ibid.

85. R. v. Moore, [1987] N.W.T.R. 47 at 51 (Terr. Ct.). See also McGillivray, supra note 30 at 34.

86. Ibid. at 55.

87. Saskatchwan Justice Report, supra note 43 at 77.

88. Ibid. at 78.

89. Ibid. at 79. A 1994 provincial initiative to develop second-stage housing in Saskatoon and Swift Current, in addition to existing secure units in Regina should hopefully help to alleviate this barrier for some women in transition.

90. Tearmann Report, supra note 49 at 14.

91. Ibid. at 14.

92. Ibid. at 17.

93. Mahoney, supra note 35 at 16.

94. Similarly, in the Literature Review of the Manitoba Spouse Abuse Project, supra note 41 at 18, it is reported that “[o]n the basis of combined victim survey and police observational studies, we can estimate that for 100 wife assaults about seven are detected by police and about one arrest is made.” [citing Dutton, 1987]. These statistics must be applied with caution: anecdotal reports in Saskatchewan indicate that things have improved, at least in the cities. Likewise the statistics are not applicable to other areas of the country, particularly larger cities where municipal initiatives have been taken directly like Vancouver, London, Ontario, metropolitan Toronto and metropolitan Montreal.

95. See Mahoney, supra note 11.

96. Tearmann Report, supra note 49 at 34.

97. E.g. in Wilkins v. Wilkins (1987), 7 R.F.L. (3d) 199 (Ont. Fam. Ct.) [hereinafter Wilkins] an ex-husband was found in contempt of a non-harassment order under the Family Law Act, S.O. 1986, c. 4 for sending his ex-wife dozens of derogatory letters and cards, being seen repeatedly in the building where she worked, and phoning her repeatedly both at work and at home until she was forced to resign from her job. Recent stalking provisions introduced into the Criminal Code may provide some recourse for these types of behaviours. Likewise, the Victims of Domestic Violence Act, supra note 61 at s. 3(d), provides for an order restraining the respondent from communicating with the victim or other specified persons.

98. A woman student left her abusive spouse at the beginning of the school year; when she returned for her belongings, he had taken her computer and hidden it in another city. (Oral account by student, biographical details on file with author.) The Victims of Domestic Violence Act, ibid., addresses this issue as well by providing for an emergency intervention order for police escort to remove belongings from the home within a specified time.

99. See Wilkins, supra note 97 at 201. “The father telephoned the Children's Aid Society and insisted on an investigation of the apparent lack of care given to the child by her mother …[The worker] stated that she really ended up being apologetic to the mother … when she found that the child was well cared for, in good health, and in a well-managed, tidy home environment.”

100. Geller, Gloria, Justice for Women Victims and Survivors of Abuse (Regina: Social Administration Research Unit, 1991)Google Scholar. Her study details findings from interviews with 34 women survivors of abuse. Of these, 20 were abused by a husband/male partner.

101. Ibid. at 18. Similarly, Linda MacLeod writes, “[W]hat most battered women really want from the criminal justice system is deterrence, protection, and community condemnation of the violence against them.” MacLeod, Linda, “Reform as Chivalry: Re-Examining ‘Progress’ in the Criminal Justice Response to Wife Battering Through the Eyes of Battered Women” (paper presented to the National Association of Women and the Law Conference, October 1987) [unpublished]Google Scholar.

102. Voices of Aboriginal Women, supra note 16 at 7.

103. Geller, supra note 100 at 19.

104. Tearmann Report, supra note 49 at 93.

105. Women's Shelter Program Report: “Police Intervention in Wife Abuse” (Office for the Prevention of Family Violence, (Edmonton: Alberta Family and Social Services, 1990) at 42Google Scholar.

106. Brown et al. eds, supra note 37.