Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T09:09:24.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Decolonization in a Digital Age: Cryptocurrencies and Indigenous Self-Determination in Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2017

Christopher Alcantara  and
Caroline Dick
Christopher Alcantara
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, The University of Western Ontario, London, [email protected]
Caroline Dick
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, The University of Western Ontario, London, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Indigenous scholars and leaders have long been interested in reducing the role of the Canadian state in their political, economic, and social lives. This paper explores the extent to which digital currencies, such as Bitcoin or MazaCoin, might be used to facilitate Indigenous self-determination, political autonomy, and economic prosperity. Based on our review of the literature, we argue that cryptocurrencies demonstrate some potential for advancing these goals but that there are a number of potential roadblocks as well. Future research should investigate how Indigenous communities might use digital currencies and other related technologies to further their political, economic, and social goals.

Résumé

Les chercheurs et les leaders autochtones cherchent depuis longtemps à réduire le rôle de l’État canadien dans la vie politique, économique et sociale des Autochtones. Cet article examine le rôle et l’importance des devises numériques, comme Bitcoin ou MazaCoin, dans l’atteinte, par les Autochtones, de l’auto-détermination, de l’autonomie politique et de la prospérité économique. D’après notre analyse documentaire, nous postulons que les crypto-monnaies peuvent contribuer à l’atteinte de ces objectifs, mais qu’elles posent également leur lot de problèmes. De futures recherches pourraient examiner les moyens que les groupes autochtones auraient pour exploiter les devises numériques et d’autres technologies connexes dans l’atteinte de leurs objectifs politiques, économiques, et sociaux.

Keywords

Indigenous self-determinationautonomydigital currencycryptocurrencyBitcoindecolonizationAuto-détermination autochtoneautonomiedevise numériqueBitcoindécolonisation
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Law and Society / La Revue Canadienne Droit et Société , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , April 2017 , pp. 19 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Law and Society Association / Association Canadienne Droit et Société 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aitken, E. 2016. Bitland’s African blockchain initiative putting land on the ledger. Forbes, 5 April. Online at: http://www.forbes.com/sites/rogeraitken/2016/04/05/bitlands-african-blockchain-initiative-putting-land-on-the-ledger/#65eea7c01029 Google Scholar
Alcantara, C. 2013. Negotiating the Deal: Comprehensive Land Claims Agreements in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Alcantara, C. 2007. Reduce transaction costs? Yes. Strengthen property rights? Maybe. The First Nations Land Management Act and economic development on Canadian Indian reserves. Public Choice 132 (3–4): 421–432.Google Scholar
Alfred, T. 1999. Peace, Power. Righteousness: An Indigenous Manifesto. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Antonopoulos, A. M. 2015. Mastering Bitcoin: Unlocking Digital Cryptocurrencies. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media Inc.Google Scholar
Borrows, J. 2002. Recovering Canada: The Resurgence of Indigenous Law. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Browning, L. 2014. Oglala Sioux hope Bitcoin alternative, MazaCoin, will change economic woes. Newsweek, 14 August.Google Scholar
Canada Revenue Agency. 2013. Fact sheet: What you should know about digital currency. Ottawa. Online at: http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/nwsrm/fctshts/2013/m11/fs131105-eng.html Google Scholar
Coulthard, G. S. 2014. Red Skin, White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
De Soto, H. 2000. The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Flanagan, T., Alcantara, C., and Le Dressay, A.. 2010. Beyond the Indian Act: Restoring Aboriginal Property Rights. Montreal-Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Gladden, M. E. 2015. Cryptocurrency with a conscience: Using artificial intelligence to develop money that advances human ethical values. Annals, Ethics in Economic Life 18 (4): 85–98.Google Scholar
Hamill, J. 2014. The battle of little bitcoin: Native American tribe launches its own cryptocurrency. Forbes, 27 February. Online at: http://www.forbes.com/sites/jasperhamill/2014/02/27/the-battle-of-little-bitcoin-native-american-tribe-launches-its-own-cryptocurrency/#30d1d2142778 Google Scholar
Helleiner, E. 1998. National currencies and national identities. American Behavioral Scientist 41 (10): 1409–1436.Google Scholar
Helleiner, E. 2000. Think globally, transact locally: Green political economy and the local currency movement. Global Society 14 (1): 35–51.Google Scholar
Hern, A. 2014. Bitcoin currency could have been attacked by 51% attack. The Guardian 16 June. Online at: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jun/16/bitcoin-currency-destroyed-51-attack-ghash-io Google Scholar
Jeffries, A. 2014. Native American tribes to adopt Bitcoin-like currency, Prepare to battle US government. The Verge, 5 March. Online at: http://www.theverge.com/2014/3/5/5469510/native-americans-assert-their-independence-through-cryptocurrency-mazacoin Google Scholar
Lanchester, J. 2016. When Bitcoin grows up. London Review of Books 38 (8): 3–12.Google Scholar
Landry, A. 2014. 9 questions surrounding MazaCoin, the Lakota cryptocurrency answered. Indian Country, 3 March. Online at: http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2014/03/03/9-questions-surrounding-mazacoin-lakota-cryptocurrency-answered-153750 Google Scholar
MacDonald, F. 2011. Indigenous peoples and neoliberal “privatization” in Canada: Opportunities, cautions, and constraints. Canadian Journal of Political Science 44 (2): 257–273.Google Scholar
McCrossan, M., and Ladner, K.. 2016. Eliminating Indigenous jurisdictions: Federalism, the supreme court of Canada, and territorial rationalities of power. Canadian Journal of Political Science 49 (3): 411–431.Google Scholar
Mougayar, W. 2015. What banks should be doing with blockchain in 2016. Coindesk, 30 December. Online at: http://www.coindesk.com/banks-should-be-doing-with-blockchain-2016/ Google Scholar
Normand, J. 2014. The audacity of Bitcoin: Risks and opportunities for corporates and investors. J.P. Morgan Report, 11 February. Online at: http://ultra-coin.com/images/Coins/206481948-JPM-the-Audacity-of-Bitcoin.pdf Google Scholar
Orraca, M., and Orraca, M. J.. 2013. Tumin, pesos or wealth? Limits and possibilities of a local alternative to scarcity of money and abundance of riches. Draft Working Paper, United Nations Non-Government Liaison Service, Geneva, Switzerland. Online at: http://www.unrisd.org/80256B42004CCC77/(httpInfoFiles)/09B90A9077D5E59BC1257B740031A6D8/$file/Orraca.pdf Google Scholar
Popper, N. 2015. Digital Gold: Bitcoin and the Inside Story of the Misfits and Millionaires Trying to Reinvent Money. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Schechner, S. 2015. EU rules Bitcoin is a currency, not a commodity—virtually. The Wall Street Journal, 22 October. Online at: http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2015/10/22/eu-rules-bitcoin-is-a-currency-not-a-commodity-virtually Google Scholar
Seyfang, G. 2001. Money that makes a change: Community currencies, north and south. Gender and Development 9 (1): 60–69.Google Scholar
Simpson, L. 2011. Dancing on Our Turtle’s Back: Stories of Nishnaabeg Re-Creation, Resurgence and a New Emergence. Winnipeg: Arbeiter Ring Publishing.Google Scholar
Sparkes, M. 2014. Native Americans adopt Bitcoin clone as official currency. The Telegraph, 28 February. Online at: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/10668018/Native-Americans-adopt-bitcoin-clone-as-official-currency.html Google Scholar
Tucker, P. C. 2009. The digital currency doppelganger: Regulatory challenge or harbinger of the new economy? Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law 17: 589–626.Google Scholar
Turner, D. 2006. This Is Not a Peace Pipe: Towards a Critical Indigenous Philosophy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
United States. Commodity Futures Trading Commission. 2015. CFTC orders Bitcoin options trading platform operator and its CEO to cease illegally offering Bitcoin options and to cease operating a facility for trading or processing of swaps without registering. Washington, DC. Online at: http://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/pr7231-15 Google Scholar
Vandervort, D., Gaucas, D., and St. Jacques, R.. 2015. Issues in designing a Bitcoin-like community currency. FC 2015 Workshops, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 78–91.Google Scholar
Vigna, P. 2014. Lakota Indian promotes new digital currency, MazaCoin. The Wall Street Journal, 7 March. Online at: http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2014/03/07/lakota-indian-promotes-new-digital-currency-mazacoin/tab/print/ Google Scholar
Vollstädt, E. 2015. How the blockchain will save the rainforests. Bitnation (blog), 31 March. Online at: https://blog.bitnation.co/how-the-blockchain-will-save-the-rainforests/ Google Scholar
Woo, David. 2013. Bitcoin: A first assessment. Bank of America, Merrill Lynch Report, 5 December. Online at: http://cryptolibrary.org/handle/21/481 Google Scholar