I would like to thank the European Commission, the Editor, an anonymous reviewer for CJLJ and student editor Irfaan Premji for wonderful comments and suggestions.

1. See, for instance, Goodin, RE, Pettit, P & Pogge, Thomas, eds, A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy (Oxford: Blackwell, 1993) at 3.Google Scholar

2. Schauer, Frederick, ‘Community, Citizenship and the Search for National Identity’ (1986) 84 Mich L Rev 1504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3. See Weiler, JHH, ‘European Neo-Constitutionalism: In Search of Foundations for the European Constitutional Order’ (1996) 44 Political Studies 517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4. On this face of racism, see Balibar, Etienne & Wallerstein, Immanuel, Race, Nation, Class: Ambiguous Identities (London: Verso, 1991)Google Scholar; Taguieff, AP ‘From Race to Culture: The New Right’s View of European Identity’ (1994) 98–99 Telos 99.Google Scholar

5. For a discussion of the problems entailed by the dichotomy, see Yack, B, ‘The Myth of the Civic Nation’ (1996) 10(2) Critical Review 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6. Compare the results of the CHALLENGE Project co-ordinated by E Guild, D Bigo, RBJ Walker & S Carrera at the Centre for European Policy Studies, CEPS, Brussels.

7. The challenge for democratic politics, therefore, is to avoid becoming enclosed in unhelpful representations, such as progressive, civic-territorial western nationalism on the one hand, and regressive, Volkish Eastern nationalism, on the other. Compare Ignatieff, M, Blood and Belonging: Journeys into the New Nationalism (New York: The Noonday Press, 1993)Google Scholar; Balibar, E, We the People of Europe? Reflections of Transnational Citizenship (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

8. Another approach would be to view the illiberal face of nationalism as the manifestation of a systemic ‘zig-zag’ that simply requires tighter supervision and control.

9. Kostakopoulou, D, ‘Towards a Theory of Constructive Citizenship in Europe’ (1996) 4(4) J Political Phil 337 at 343CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kostakopoulou, D, Citizenship, Identity and Immigration in the European Union: Between Past and Future (Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

10. See Balibar, supra note 7 at 46.

11. Kedourie, E, Nationalism (Oxford: Blackwell, [1961], 1993).Google Scholar

12. Hobsbawm, EJ, Nations and Nationalism Since 1780 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990) at 33.Google Scholar

13. Marx, Anthony, Faith in Nation: Exclusionary Origins of Nationalism (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003) at 195.Google Scholar

14. Ibid.

15. Ibid at ch 3, 6.

16. Fichte, G, Address to the German Nation (Chicago, IL: Open Court, 1922).Google Scholar

17. Vincent, Andrew, Modern Political Ideologies (Oxford: Blackwell, 1993) at 158.Google Scholar

18. Badiou, Compare A, The Century (Oxford: Polity Press, 2007).Google Scholar

19. Kohn, H, Idea of Nationalism: A Study of its Origins and Background (New York: Macmillan, 1945)Google Scholar; Meinecke, F, Weltburgertum und Nationalstaat (Munchen: Werk Bd 5, 1922).Google Scholar For a critique, see Kuzio, Taras, ‘The Myth of a Civic State: A Critical survey of Hans Kohn’s Framework for Understanding Nationalism’ (2002) 25(1) Ethnic and Racial Studies 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

20. Plamenatz, J, ‘Two types of Nationalism’ in Kamenka, E, ed, Nationalism: the Evolution of an Idea (London: Edward Arnold, 1976) 22 at 27.Google Scholar

21. Dunn, J, Western Political Theory in the Face of the Future (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979) at 55.Google Scholar

22. Kymlicka, W, ‘Misunderstanding Nationalism’ (1995) Dissent 130;Google Scholar Miller, D, On Nationality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995);Google Scholar Tamir, Yael, Liberal Nationalism (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993);Google Scholar Canovan, Margaret, Nationhood and Political Theory (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 1996).Google Scholar

23. Margalit, Avishai & Raz, Joseph, ‘National Self-Determination’ (1990) 87(9) J Phil 439 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Margalit, Avishai & Halbertal, Moshe, ‘Liberalism and the Right to Culture’ (1994) 61(3) Social Research 491 Google Scholar; Kymlicka, W, Liberalism, Community and Culture (Oxford: Clarendon, 1989)Google Scholar; Kymlicka, W, Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995)Google Scholar; Raz, J, Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

24. Moore, M, ed, National Self-Determination and Secession (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar; Taylor, C, The Ethics of Authenticity (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

25. Lind, Michael, ‘In Defence of Liberal Nationalism’ (1994) 73(3) Foreign Affairs 87 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Moore, Margaret, ‘Normative justifications for liberal nationalism: justice, democracy and national identity’ (2001) 7(1) Nations and Nationalism 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

26. Tamir, supra note 22.

27. Miller, supra note 22.

28. Moore highlights the alleged constitutive impact of nationalism on the self; The Ethics of Nationalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google ScholarPubMed

29. Compare MacCormick, N, ‘Is Nationalism Philosophically Credible?’ in Twining, W, ed, Issues in Self-Determination(Aberdeen, UK: Aberdeen University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

30. As Kymlicka has observed, “the nation-state has been seen as the privileged locus for political participation, self-government, and solidarity. If democracy is the rule ‘of the people’, then it is the nation that defines ‘the people’ who are to rule themselves.” In ‘Liberal Nationalism and Cosmopolitan Justice’ in Benhabib, S, ed, Another Cosmopolitanism (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008) at 129.Google Scholar

31. According to Kymlicka, a relatively stable societal culture is required, supra note 23.

32. Kymlicka, W, Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism and Citizenship (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001) 25 at 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

33. Spencer, Philip & Wollman, Howard, Nationalism: A Critical Introduction (London: Sage, 2002) at 63.Google Scholar

34. As JS Mill stated, ‘free institutions are next to impossible in a country made up of different nationalities. Among a people without fellow-feeling, especially if they read and speak different languages, the united public opinion, necessary to the working of representative government, cannot exist.’ ‘Considerations on Representative Government’ in Acton, HB, ed, Utilitarianism, On Liberty and Considerations on Representative Government (London: Dent, [1863] 1972) at 382.Google Scholar

35. Anderson, Benedict, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism (London: Verso, 1983).Google Scholar A core assertion of nationalism, however, is that the interests of the nation take priority over all other interests; Breuilly, John, Nationalism and the State (Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 1993) at 2.Google Scholar

36. Miller, supra note 22.

37. As Miller, has argued, ‘trust is more likely to exist among people who have a common national identity, speak a common language and have overlapping values’ in Market, State and Community: Theoretical Foundations for Market Socialism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989) at 236–37;Google Scholar Miller, supra note 22 at 98. But compare, Mason, Andrew, ‘Integration, Cohesion and National Identity: Theoretical Reflections on Recent British Policy’ (2010) 40 British J Pol Science 857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

38. Miller, supra note 22 at 92-95. For a critique, see Weinstock, Daniel, ‘Is there a Moral Case for Nationalism?’ (1996) 13(1) J Applied Phil 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

39. Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971)Google Scholar; Habermas, J, ‘Citizenship and National Identity: Some Reflections on the Future of Europe’ (1992) 12(1) Praxis International 1 Google Scholar; Habermas, J, ‘Struggles for Recognition in Constitutional States’ (1993) 1(2) European J Phil 128 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Habermas, J, Between Facts andNorms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996).Google Scholar

40. King, Desmond, The Liberty of Strangers: Making the American Nation (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

41. Miller, supra note 22; Kymlicka, supra note 32; King, supra note 40.

42. I have in mind the idea of rooted cosmopolitanism, which accommodates commitments to cultural particularity as well as transnational solidarity and respect for human rights. On this, see Cohen, Mitchell, ‘Rooted Cosmopolitanism’ (1992) 1995(Fall) Dissent 487 Google Scholar; Ackerman, Bruce, ‘Rooted Cosmopolitanism’ (1994) 104(3) Ethics 516 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Appiah, Kwame Anthony, ‘Cosmopolitan Patriots’ (1997) 23(3) Critical Inquiry 617 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Compare also, Nussbaum, MC, For Love of Country: Debating the Limits of Patriotism (Boston: Beacon Press, 1996).Google Scholar

43. According to Anthony Smith, the idea that loyalty to the nation-state overrides other loyalties is one of the seven propositions that make up the core nationalist doctrine; Smith, Anthony D, Nationalism in the Twentieth Century (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1979).Google Scholar

44. See Kostakopoulou, Theodora, ‘Towards a Constructive Theory of Citizenship’ (1996) 4(4) J Pol Phil 337 at 103CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and see infra note 65; Abizadeh, Arash, ‘Does Liberal Democracy Presuppose a Cultural Nation? Four Arguments’ (2002) 96(3) Am Pol Science Rev 495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

45. Nathanson, Stephen, ‘In Defense of Moderate Patriotism’ (1989) 99(3) Ethics 535 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gomberg, Paul, ‘Patriotism is like Racism’ (1990) 101(1) Ethics 144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; MacIntyre, Alasdair, ‘Is Patriotism a Virtue?’, EH Lindley Lecture, University of Kansas, 1984 Google Scholar. Gans, Chaim has attempted to differentiate cultural from statist nationalism and to defend a sub- and inter-statist concept of cultural nationalism within the framework of the state; The Limits of Nationalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar Compare also, Norman, Wayne, Negotiating Nationalism: Nation-Building, Federalism and Secession in a Multicultural State (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996)Google Scholar; Bhabha, Homi K, ed, Nation and Narration (London: Routledge, 1990)Google Scholar; Nelson, Dana D, National Manhood: Capitalist Citizenship and the Imagined Fraternity of White Men (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

46. Held, David, McGrew, Anthony, Goldblatt, David & Perraton, Jonathan, Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Culture (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1999).Google Scholar

47. See Dallmayr, F & Rosales, JM, eds, Beyond Nationalism? Sovereignty and Citizenship (Lanham, MD: Lexington, 2001)Google Scholar; MacCormick, Neil, ‘Liberalism, Nationalism and the PostSovereign State’ (1996) 44(3) Political Studies 553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

48. Soysal, Yasemin, Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Post-national Citizenship in Europe (Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, 1994)Google Scholar; Jacobson, David, Rights Across Borders— Immigration and the Decline of Citizenship (Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

49. For a defence of the opposite view, see Kymlicka, supra note 30 at 132-34. He argues that Europeanisation is morally progressive because it is consolidating and diffusing liberal nationhood, but his argument, which is premised on political developments in Southern Europe and Central Europe, conflates processes of democratisation with processes of nationalisation. Southern European states had embarked upon nation-building processes before their democratisation.

50. Habermas, supra note 39, ‘Citizenship and National Identity’ and Between Facts and Norms. Compare also Markell, Patchen, ‘Making Affect Safe for Democracy? On Constitutional Patriotism’ (2000) 28(1) Political Theory 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

51. Baubock, Rainer, Transnational Citizenship (Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar, 1994)Google Scholar; Faist, T, The Volume and Dynamics of International Migration and Transnational Social Spaces (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

52. Apel, Karl-Otto, ‘Discourse Ethics, Democracy, and International Law: Toward a Globalisation of Practical Reason’ (2007) 66(1) Am J Economics & Sociology 49 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Vincent, Andrew, ‘Liberal Nationalism: An Irresponsible Compound?’ (1997) 45(2) Political Studies 275 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Shue, H, ‘Solidarity among Strangers and the Right to Food’ in Aiken, W & Follette, H La, eds, World, Hunger and Morality (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1996) 113 Google Scholar; Parekh, Bhikhu, ‘Cosmopolitanism and Global Citizenship’ (2003) 29(1) Rev Int’l Studies 3.Google Scholar

53. Vincent, supra note 52 at 294 n 75; Compare also Mann, Michael, The Dark Side of Democracy. Explaining Ethnic Cleansing (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

54. Mudde, Cas, ‘The Single-Issue Party Thesis: Extreme Right Parties and the Immigration Issue’ (1999) 22(3) West European Politics 182 at 190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

55. Joppke, Christian & Morawska, Ewa, Towards Assimilation and Citizenship. Immigrants in Liberal Nation-States (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003), at 5–9.Google Scholar

56. Joppke, Christian, ‘Beyond national models: civic integration policies for immigrants in Western Europe’ (2007) 30(1) Western European Politics 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

57. On the distinction between blind and constructive patriotism, see Schatz, Robert T et al, ‘On the variety of national attachment: blind versus constructive patriotism’ (1999) 20(1) Political Psychology 151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

58. Third Report of the European Commission Against Racism and Xenophobia (27 June 1997), Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 12 February 2008, at 34.

59. Delanty reflects on this paradox in ‘Nationalism and Cosmopolitanism: the Paradox of Modernity’ in Delanty, Gerard & Kumar, Krishan, eds, The Sage Handbook of Nations and Nationalism (London: Sage, 2006) at 357–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar See also Sassen, Saskia, Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

60. See Balibar, supra note 7. According to Breuilly, a core assertion of the nationalist doctrine is that a unique, timeless and superior ‘us’ is juxtaposed to lesser ‘them’; Breuilly supra note 35 at 2.

61. For an opposite argument, see Calhoun, Craig J, Nations Matter: Culture, History and the Cosmopolitan Dream (London: Routledge, 2007).Google Scholar See also Helbling, Marc, ‘Nationalism and Democracy: Competing or Complementary logics? (2009) 1 Living Reviews in Democracy 1.Google Scholar

62. State nationalism would thus become a ‘banal’ nationalism; Billig, M, Banal Nationalism (London: Sage, 1997).Google Scholar

63. I paraphrase Mill, JS here; On Liberty [1869] (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989) at 13.Google Scholar

64. Kostakopoulou, ‘Towards a Theory of Constructive Citizenship’, supra note 9.

65. Ibid. I have elaborated on, and defended, this model of citizenship in Kostakopoulou, , The Future Governance of Citizenship (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar Compare also Rubio-Marin, Ruth, Immigration as a Democratic Challenge: Citizenship and Inclusion in Germany and the United States (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Shachar, Ayelet, The Birthright Lottery: Citizenship and Inequality (Boston, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

66. Young, Iris Marion, Justice and the Politics of Difference (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990)Google Scholar; Connolly, William E, The Ethos of Pluralisation (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1995).Google Scholar

67. Dewey, John, Democracy and Education (New York: Macmillan, 1964 [1916]) at 87.Google Scholar

68. Goodin, Robert E, ‘Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives’ (2007) 35(1) Phil & Pub Affairs 40 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Abizadeh, Arash, ‘Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control your Own Borders’ (2008) 36(1) Political Theory 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar See also Miller, David, ‘Why Immigration Controls Are Not Coercive: A Reply to Arash Abizadeh’ (2010) 38(1) Political Theory 111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Abizadeh, Arash, ‘Democratic Legitimacy and State Coercion: A Reply to David Miller’ (2010) 38(1) Political Theory 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

69. On the ‘right thoughts’ see, Devlin, P, The Enforcement of Morals (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1965).Google Scholar On the exclusion of those deemed to be incapable of active citizenship and this ‘deficient’, such as women, children, the sick and so on, see Balibar, supra note 7 at 59.

70. Simmel, used the term ‘sociation’ to describe the dynamic and continuous process of social group formation; The Philosophy of Money (London: Routledge, 1990).Google Scholar

71. I am grateful to the CJLJ anonymous reviewer for pinpointing this.

72. I have elaborated on this in Kostakopoulou, , ‘The Anatomy of Civic Integration’ (2010) 73(6) Modern L Rev 933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

73. I paraphrase Huxley, Aldous, Brave New World (London: Albatross, 1947).Google Scholar

74. Carens, Joseph H, ‘Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders’ (1987) 49(2) Rev Politics 251 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Carens, Joseph H, ‘A Reply to Meilaender: Reconsidering Open Borders’ (1999) 33(4) International Migration Review 1082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bader, Veit, ‘Ethics of Immigration’ (2005) 12(3) Constellations 331 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bader, Veit, ‘Citizenship and Exclusion’ (1995) 23(2) Political Theory 211 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Blake, M, ‘Immigration’ in Frey, RG & Wellman, Christopher Heath, eds, A Companion to Applied Ethics (Oxford: Blackwell, 1995) 224 Google Scholar; Cole, Phillip, Philosophies of Exclusion: Liberal Political Theory and Immigration (Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press, 2000)Google Scholar; Seglow, Jonathan, ‘The Ethics of Migration’ (2005) 3(3) Political Studies Rev 317 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Barry, Brian & Goodin, Robert E, eds, Free Movement: Ethical Issues in the Transnational Migration of People and of Money, (Philadelphia: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

75. Dowty, A, Closed Borders: The Contemporary Assault on Freedom of Movement (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1987)Google Scholar; Ann Dummett, ‘The Transnational Migration of People Seen From Within a Natural Law Perspective’ in Barry & Goodin, ibid at 169. The discussion of whether migration is a secondary concern and whether we should focus on ensuring a more equitable global distribution falls outside the scope of this discussion.

76. See Cole, supra note 74; Hayter, Teresa, Open Borders: The Case against Immigration Controls (London: Pluto, 2000)Google Scholar; Isbister, John, ‘Are Immigration Controls Ethical?’ in Jonas, Susanne & Thomas, Suzanne Dod, eds, Immigration: A Civil Rights Issue for the Americas (Wilmington, DE: Social Justice, 1999) 85 Google Scholar; Carens, Joseph H, ‘Open Borders and Liberal Limits: A Response to Isbister’ (2000) 34(2) Int’l Migration Rev 636.Google Scholar

77. Walzer, Michael, Spheres of Justice: A Defence of Pluralism and Equality (New York: Basic Books, 1983).Google Scholar

78. Michael Blake & Mathias Risse, ‘Is There a Human Right to Free Movement? Immigration and Original Ownership of the Earth’ in Kennedy School of Government Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP06-012.

79. Robert E Goodin, ‘If People Were Money…’ in Barry & Goodin, supra note 74 at 6.

80. Schotel, B, On the Right of Exclusion: Law, Ethics and Immigration Policy (London: Routledge, 2010).Google Scholar

81. Abizadeh, ‘Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control your Own Borders’, supra note 68.

82. Oppenheim, L, International Law, 8th ed by Lauterpacht, H, (1955) at 675–76.Google Scholar See also Vatel’s Law of Nations, book 1, s 231; book 2, s 125.

83. For a different interpretation of the Kantian right of hospitality, see S Benhabib, supra note 30 at 1-26.

84. Citizens in time t make important decisions about who should be included and excluded from entry and settlement, as if they have a ‘natural’ right to decide about the future of a country, city or neighbourhood because they are, and will be, ‘theirs’. By calling into question the property ownership assumption and fostering an appreciation for the time-boundedness of people, decisions about admission into a space, that nobody ultimately owns but everybody needs and uses, are expected to be accompanied by foresight, prudence, sensitivity and empathy.

85. Simon, Julian Lincoln, The Economic Consequences of Immigration (Oxford: Blackwell, 1989)Google Scholar; Butcher, K & Card, D, ‘Immigration and Wages: Evidence from the 1980s’ (1991) 81 Am Economic Rev 292 Google Scholar. Compare also European Commission, Communication on immigration, integration and employment (3 June 2003), COM (2003) 336 final.Google ScholarPubMed

86. Tugwell, RG, ‘Beyond Nationalism’ (1951) 22(4) Pol Quarterly 346 at 350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

87. Dewey, John, ‘Creative Democracy—The Task Before Us’ reprinted in Fisch, M, ed, Classic American Philosophers (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1951) at 394.Google Scholar

88. Dewey, J, The Public and its Problems (New York: H Holt, 1927 Google Scholar, reprinted by Swallow Press and Ohio University Press, 1991) at 217.

89. Smith, Rogers M, Stories of Peoplehood: The Politics and Morals of Political Membership (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003) 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

90. Calvino, I, Invisible Cities (London: Vintage, 1997) at 117.Google Scholar