Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:10:22.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Which emergency department patients with minor head injuries require computed tomography?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Eddie Jin  and
Michael J. Bullard
Eddie Jin
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
Michael J. Bullard*
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
*
University of Alberta Hospital, 8440 — 112 St., Edmonton AB T6G 2B7; 780 407–704, fax 780 407–3314, [email protected]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
CJEM Journal Club • Club de lecture du JCMU
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , May 2002 , pp. 209 - 211
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2002

References

1.Miller, EG, Holmes, JF, Derlet, RW.Utilizing clinical factors to reduce head CT scan ordering for minor head trauma patients. J Emerg Med 1997;15:453–7.Google Scholar
2.Haydel, MJ, Preston, CA, Mills, TJ, Luber, S, Blaudeau, E, De-Blieux, PMC. Indications for computer tomography in patients with minor head injury. N Engl J Med 2000;343(2):100–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Stiell, IG, Wells, GA, Hoag, RA, Sivilotti, MLA, Cacciotti, TF, Verbeek, RP, et al. A multicentre trial to introduce clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. BMJ 1995;311:594–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Stiell, IG, Wells, GA, Vandemheen, K, Laupacis, A, Brison, R, Eisenhauer, MA, et al. Variation in ED use of computer tomography for patients with minor head injury. Ann Emerg Med 1997;30:14–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Graham, ID, Stiell, IG, Laupacis, A, O’Connor, AM, Wells, GA.Emergency physicians’ attitudes toward and use of clinical decision rules for radiography. Acad Emerg Med 1998;5:134–40.Google Scholar