Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:19:47.458Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Understanding Equivalence Trials (and Why We Should Care)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Jacques S. Lee
Jacques S. Lee*
Affiliation:
Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
*
[email protected]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Academics • Formation
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , July 2000 , pp. 194 - 196
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2000

References

1.Wood, VM, Christenson, JM, Innes, GD, Lesperance, M, McKnight, RD. The NARC (Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory in Renal Colic) Trial. Single-dose intravenous ketorolac versus titrated intravenous meperidine in acute renal colic: a randomized clinical trial. CJEM 2000;2:83–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Norman, G, Streiner, D.Biostatistics: the bare essentials. St. Louis: Mosby; 1994. p. 42.Google Scholar
3.The GUSTO investigators. An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1993;329:673–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Innes, GD, Macphail, I, Dillon, EC, Metcalfe, C, Gao, M.Dexamethasone prevents relapse after emergency department treatment of acute migraine: a randomized clinical trial. CJEM 1999;1:26–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed