Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:36:49.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sentinel surveillance of HIV and hepatitis C virus in two urban emergency departments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Stan Houston*
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Capital Health; and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
Brian H. Rowe
Affiliation:
Division of Emergency Medicine, Capital Health; and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta
Laura Mashinter
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta
Jutta Preiksaitis
Affiliation:
Public Health Laboratory for Northern Alberta, Alberta Health and Wellness, Edmonton, Alta
Mark Joffe
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Capital Health; and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
Duncan Mackey
Affiliation:
Division of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta; and Lethbridge Regional Hospital, Lethbridge, Alta
John Galbraith
Affiliation:
Dynacare Kasper Medical Laboratories, Edmonton, Alta
Natasha Wiebe
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta
*
Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, Rm. 1G1.43 WMC, 8440–112 St., Edmonton AB T6G 2B7; 780 407–6707, fax 780 407–3982, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objectives:

This study was designed to determine the prevalence of HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) in a specific population, and to distinguish between known and previously unrecognized infections in the emergency department (ED) setting.

Methods:

Consecutive patients aged 15 to 54 years who had presented to the EDs of 2 urban hospitals during a 6-week period were enrolled in a prospective cross-sectional study if a complete blood count had been obtained as part of their care. The study patients were initially cross-referenced against local databases of known HIV and HCV seropositive patients. After removal of all personal identifiers, the study patients’ leftover blood was serotested for HIV and HCV, and seroprevalences were calculated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with HIV and HCV infection.

Results:

Of 3057 individuals whose files were analyzed, 1457 (48%) were male and 7% (213) were Aboriginal. Overall, 302 patients (10%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9%–11%) were seropositive for HCV and, of these, only 132 (44%) were previously known to be. HCV seropositivity was associated with Aboriginal status, age, male gender, hospital site and HIV infection (all p < 0.001). In contrast, 39 patients (1%; 95% CI, 1%–2%) were HIV seropositive. Of these, 32 (82%) were previously known to be HIV positive, and 27 (69%) were HCV seropositive. HIV seropositivity was only associated with HCV infection (p < 0.001).

Conclusions:

The rate of previously undetected infections was relatively low for HIV but high for HCV. Emergency physicians in urban settings will frequently encounter patients not known to be HCV positive and not identified as such. These results emphasize the need for more effective preventive measures in the community and the importance of observing standard (universal) precautions in ED practice.

Type
EM Advances • Innovations En MU
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2004

References

1.The report on the global HIV/AIDS epidemic: the Barcelona Report. The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. Geneva, Switzerland: 2002.Google Scholar
2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommendations and reports. Recommendations for prevention and control of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and HCV-related chronic disease. Oct 16, 1998. MMWR Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep 1998;47 (RR19):139. Available: www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00055154.htm (accessed 2004 Jan 19).Google Scholar
3.Remis, R.HIV incidence among injection drug users in Vancouver. CMAJ 2002;166:9089.Google ScholarPubMed
4.Schabas, R.Report on the meeting of the Expert Panel on Hepatitis C Epidemiology. Population and Public Health Branch (formerly LCDC). Ottawa: Health Canada; 1998.Google Scholar
5.Sturm, JT.HIV prevalence in a midwestern emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 1991; 20:2768.Google Scholar
6.Goggin, MA, Davidson, AJ, Cantrill, SV, O’Keefe, LK, Douglas, JM.The extent of undiagnosed HIV infection among emergency department patients: results of a blinded seroprevalence survey and a pilot HIV testing program. J Emerg Med 2000;19:139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Kelen, GD, Hexter, DA, Hansen, KN, Tang, N, Pretorius, S, Quinn, TC.Trend in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection among a patient population of an inner-city emergency department: implications for emergency department-based screening programs for HIV infection. Clin Infect Dis 1995; 21:86775.Google Scholar
8.Strathdee, SA, Patrick, DM, Currie, SL, Cornelisse, PG, Rekart, ML, Montaner, JS, et al. Needle exchange is not enough: lessons learned from the Vancouver injecting drug use study. AIDS 1997;11:F5965.Google Scholar
9.Kelen, GD, Shahan, JB, Quinn, TC.Emergency department-based HIV screening and counseling: experience with rapid and standard serologic testing. Ann Emerg Med 1999;33:14755.Google Scholar
10.Evaluation of serum pooling for use in an anti-HCV seroprevalence study. 64th Conjoint Meeting on Infectious Diseases, Canadian Association of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hamilton, Ont., 1996.Google Scholar
11.Schochetman, G, George, JR, editors. Detection of HIV infection using serologic techniques in AIDS testing. In: AIDS testing: a comprehensive guide to technical, medical, social, legal, and management issues. 2nd ed. New York: Springer–Verlag; 1994. p. 62102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Janssen, RS, Satten, GA, Stramer, SL, Rawal, BD, O’Brien, TR, Weiblen, BJ, et al. New testing strategy to detect early HIV-1 infection for use in incidence estimates and for clinical and prevention purposes. JAMA 1998;290:2842.Google Scholar
13.Revised guidelines on ethical and legal considerations in anonymous unlinked HIV seroprevalence research. Federal Centre for AIDS Working Group on Anonymous Unlinked HIV Sero-prevalence Research. CMAJ 1992;146(10):17436.Google Scholar
14.Global Programme on AIDS. Unlinked anonymous screening for the public health surveillance of HIV infections; proposed international guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1989.Google Scholar
15.Romanowski, B, Campbell, PJ, Preiksaitis, JK, Fonseca, K.Human immununodeficiency virus seroprevalence and risk behaviour in patients attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic in Alberta. Sex Transm Dis 1997;24:48794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Jacobs, P, Calder, P, Taylor, M, Houston, S, Saunders, LD, Albert, T.Cost effectiveness of Streetworks’ needle exchange program of Edmonton. Can J Public Health 1999; 90:16871.Google Scholar
17.Remis, R, in collaboration with the Hepatitis C Working Group for Blood-borne Pathogens Division, Laboratory Centre for Disease Control, Health Canada. Estimating the number of blood transfusion recipients infected by hepatitis C virus in Canada, 196085 and 199092. Ottawa: Health Canada; 1998. Available: www.hc-sc.gc.ca/pphb-dgspsp/hcai-iamss/bbp-pts/pdf/annex_e.pdf (accessed 2004 Jan 27).Google Scholar
18.Alter, MJ, Kruszon-Moran, MS, Nainan, OV, McQuillan, GM, Gao, F, Moyer, LA, et al. The prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in the United States, 1988 through 1994. N Engl J Med 1999;341:55662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Birse, E, Shokoples, S, Houston, S.Demographic and clinical features of aboriginal and non-aboriginal patients with HIV infection in Northern Alberta. Can J Infect Dis 1999;10(suppl B):66B.Google Scholar
20.Wenstrom, KD, Zuidema, LJ.Determination of the seropreva-lence of human immunodeficiency virus infection in gravidas by non-anonymous versus anonymous testing. Obstet Gynecol 1989;74:55861.Google Scholar