Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T14:43:49.155Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Reviewers were Thinking Wisely

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2015

Oliver Robak  and
Michael Frass
Michael Frass
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine I, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters • Correspondance
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , January 2014 , pp. 9
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2014

References

1.Eby, D.What were the reviewers thinking? [letter]. CJEM 2013;16:8.Google Scholar
2.Banyai, M, Falger, S, Röggla, M, et al. Emergency intubation with the Combitube in a grossly obese patient with bull neck. Resuscitation 1993;26:271–6, doi:10.1016/0300-9572(93)90148-J.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Mort, TC.Laryngeal mask airway and bougie intubation failures: theCombitube as a secondary rescue device for inhospital emergency airway management. Anesth Analg 2006;103:1264–6, doi:10.1213/01.ane.0000242521.58073.85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Staudinger, T, Tesinsky, P, Klappacher, G, et al. Emergency intubation with the Combitube in two cases of difficult airway management. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1995;12:189–93.Google Scholar