Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:27:41.630Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P122: Ready for the story? A mixed methods systematic review of factors that influence handovers between prehospital personnel and emergency department nurses receiving patients arriving by ambulance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2018

G. Reay*
Affiliation:
University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
J. Norris
Affiliation:
University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
L. Nowell
Affiliation:
University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
J. Abraham
Affiliation:
University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
A. Hayden
Affiliation:
University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
K. Yokom
Affiliation:
University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
G. Lazarenko
Affiliation:
University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
E. S. Lang
Affiliation:
University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
*
*Corresponding author

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Introduction: Safe and efficient handovers between emergency medical services (EMS) practitioners and emergency nurses are vital as poor transitions may lead to loss of information and place patients at risk for adverse events. We conducted a mixed methods systematic review to a) examine factors that disrupt or improve handovers from EMS practitioners to emergency department nurses, and b) investigate the effectiveness of interventional strategies that lead to improvements in communication and fewer adverse events. Methods: We searched electronic databases (DARE, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, Joanna Briggs Institute EBP; Communication Abstracts); grey literature (grey literature databases, organization websites, querying experts in emergency medicine); and reference lists of the included studies. Citation tracking was conducted for the included studies. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full-texts for inclusion and methodological quality using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool for quantitative studies and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critic Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. Narrative and thematic synthesis were conducted to integrate and explore relationships within the data. Results: Twenty-two studies were included in this review from the 6150 records initially retrieved. Our analysis suggests that qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research approaches have been utilized to explore handovers. Studies (n=11) have predominantly explored existing patterns of handovers focusing on barriers and facilitators. Interventions (e.g. multimedia transmission of pre-hospital information, tailored e-learning program) were investigated in five studies. Results suggest that lack of formal handover training, workflow interruptions, workload, and strained working relationships between EMS and nursing are perceived threats to optimal handovers. Conclusion: The findings from this review can inform the development of handover interventions and contribute to a more rigorous approach to researching handovers between EMS practitioners and emergency nurses. Furthermore, there is a need for studies in which specific interventions to optimize handovers are examined.

Type
Poster Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2018