Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:20:21.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Medical myth: Bimanual pelvic examination is a reliable decision aid in the investigation of acute abdominal pain or vaginal bleeding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Todd Brown  and
Mel E. Herbert
Todd Brown
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Olive View–UCLA Medical Center, Sylmar, Calif.
Mel E. Herbert*
Affiliation:
Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles; Department of Emergency Medicine, Los Angeles County–USC Healthcare Network, Los Angeles
*
Department of Emergency Medicine, Los Angeles County–USC Healthcare Network, 1200 N State St., Los Angeles CA 90033; fax 818 347-5706 [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Reliance on the accuracy of the pelvic examination is upheld in many medical textbooks, but review of the literature does not support the accuracy or reproducibility of this examination. That this “test” is useful for ruling out serious disease will be exposed for the myth that it is.

Keywords

cervixexamination, interrater reliabilitypelvicuterus
Type
Medical Mythology • Mythes Médicaux
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , March 2003 , pp. 120 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2003

References

1.Close RJH, Sachs, CJ., Dyne, PL.Reliability of bimanual pelvic examinations performed in emergency departments. West J Med 2001;175:240–4.Google Scholar
2.Padilla, LA., Radosevich, DM., Milad, MP.Accuracy of the pelvic examination in detecting adnexal masses. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:593–8.Google Scholar
3.Phelan, MB., Valley, VT., Mateer, JR.Pelvic ultrasonography. Emed Clin N Am 1997;15:789–824.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Jacobson, L.Differential diagnosis of acute pelvic inflammatory disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980;138:1006–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Eschenbach, DA.Epidemiology and diagnosis of acute pelvic inflammatory disease. Obstet Gynecol 1980;55:142S-52S.Google Scholar
6.Houry, D., Abbott, JT.Ovarian torsion: a fifteen year review. Ann Emer Med 2001;38:156–9.Google Scholar
7.Dart, RG., Kaplan, B., Varaklis, K.Predictive value of history and physical examination in patients with suspected ectopic pregnancy. Ann Emer Med 1999;33:283–90.Google Scholar
8.Andolf, E., Joergensen, C.A prospective comparison of clinical ultrasound and operative examination of the female Pelvis. J Ultrasound Med 1988;7:617–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Frederick, JL., Paulson, RJ., Sauer, MV.Routine use of vaginal ultrasonography in the preoperative evaluation of gynecologic patients. J Reprod Med 1991;36:779–82.Google Scholar