Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T14:19:27.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

LO39: Healthcare costs among homeless and/or substance using adults presenting to the emergency department: a single centre study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2017

V.V. Puri*
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
K. Dong
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
B.H. Rowe
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
S.W. Kirkland
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
C. Vandenberghe
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
G. Salvalaggio
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
R. Cooper
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
A. Newton
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
C. Wild
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
S. Gupta
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
J.K. Khangura
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
C. Villa-Roel
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
C. McCabe
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
*
*Corresponding authors

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Introduction: Active substance use and unstable housing are both associated with increased emergency department (ED) utilization. This study examined ED health care costs among a cohort of substance using and/or homeless adults following an index ED visit, relative to a control ED population. Methods: Consecutive patients presenting to an inner-city ED between August 2010 and November 2011 who reported unstable housing and/or who had a chief presenting complaint related to acute or chronic substance use were evaluated. Controls were enrolled in a 1:4 ratio. Participants’ health care utilization was tracked via electronic medical record for six months after the index ED visit. Costing data across all EDs in the region was obtained from Alberta Health Services and calculated to include physician billing and the cost of an ED visit excluding investigations. The cost impact of ED utilization was estimated by multiplying the derived ED cost per visit by the median number of visits with interquartile ranges (IQR) for each group during follow up. Proportions were compared using non-parametric tests. Results: From 4679 patients screened, 209 patients were enrolled (41 controls, 46 substance using, 91 unstably housed, 31 both unstably housed and substance using (UHS)). Median costs (IQR) per group over the six-month period were $0 ($0-$345.42) for control, $345.42 ($0-$1139.89) for substance using, $345.42 ($0-$1381.68) for unstably housed and $1381.68 ($690.84-$4248.67) for unstably housed and substance using patients (p<0.05). Conclusion: The intensity of excess ED costs was greatest in patients who were both unstably housed and presenting with a chief complaint related to substance use. This group had a significantly larger impact on health care expenditure relative to ED users who were not unstably housed or who presented with a substance use related complaint. Further research into how care or connection to community resources in the ED can reduce these costs is warranted.

Type
Oral Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2017